FLR vs. FIX
FLR (Fluor Corporation) and FIX (Comfort Systems USA, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, FLR returned 0.33%/yr vs 50.73%/yr for FIX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLR vs. FIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLR achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly lower than FIX's 98.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FLR has underperformed FIX with an annualized return of 0.33%, while FIX has yielded a comparatively higher 50.73% annualized return.
FLR
- 1D
- 4.12%
- 1M
- 14.34%
- YTD
- 24.96%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 11.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.33%
FIX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- YTD
- 98.62%
- 6M
- 87.34%
- 1Y
- 263.59%
- 3Y*
- 127.92%
- 5Y*
- 85.83%
- 10Y*
- 50.73%
FLR vs. FIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLR Fluor Corporation | 24.96% | -19.65% | 25.91% | 13.01% | 39.93% | 55.10% | -14.55% | -39.54% | -36.61% | 0.15% |
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 98.62% | 120.86% | 106.89% | 79.62% | 16.98% | 88.98% | 6.73% | 15.07% | 0.73% | 32.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLR and FIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2000 | 0.42 |
The correlation between FLR and FIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLR:
$2.65
FIX:
$34.64
FLR:
18.68
FIX:
53.47
FLR:
0.04
FIX:
0.81
FLR:
0.43
FIX:
6.45
FLR:
$15.19B
FIX:
$10.14B
FLR:
-$247.00M
FIX:
$2.55B
FLR:
-$276.00M
FIX:
$1.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLR vs. FIX — Risk / Return Rank
FLR
FIX
FLR vs. FIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluor Corporation (FLR) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLR | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.65 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 19.28 | -18.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 59.72 | -59.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLR | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 4.98 | -4.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 1.94 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | 1.20 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.40 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
FLR vs. FIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLR drawdown since its inception was -95.89%, roughly equal to the maximum FIX drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLR and FIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLR | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.89% | -93.36% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.19% | -13.77% | -16.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.63% | -46.05% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.63% | -46.05% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.16% | -49.68% | -44.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.08% | -9.28% | -30.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.62% | -38.08% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.45% | 4.46% | +14.99% |
Volatility
FLR vs. FIX - Volatility Comparison
Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a higher volatility of 21.30% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) at 12.60%. This indicates that FLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLR | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.30% | 12.60% | +8.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.11% | 37.27% | -3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.24% | 53.46% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.18% | 44.49% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.67% | 42.35% | +15.32% |
Dividends
FLR vs. FIX - Dividend Comparison
FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.28% | 0.41% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.88% |
FLR Fluor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.78% |
Financials
FLR vs. FIX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fluor Corporation and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLR vs. FIX - Profitability Comparison
FLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.00M and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.4%.
FIX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 754.41M and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.
FLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 92.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
FIX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.72M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.
FLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
FIX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 370.38M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLR and FIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLR has higher volatility (21.30%) compared to FIX (12.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLR dropped -95.89% vs FIX's -93.36%.
FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLR and FIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer