FLCH vs. URNU.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and URNU.L (Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while URNU.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLCH returned 8.94%/yr vs 35.39%/yr for URNU.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for URNU.L.

Performance

FLCH vs. URNU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than URNU.L's 8.71% return.

FLCH

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -8.03%
• YTD: -9.50%
• 6M: -11.21%
• 1Y: 2.19%
• 3Y*: 8.94%
• 5Y*: -5.25%
• 10Y*: —

URNU.L

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -17.50%
• YTD: 8.71%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: 48.14%
• 3Y*: 35.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. URNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-9.50%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-8.09%
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc	8.71%	70.50%	1.19%	39.91%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and URNU.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2022	0.29

FLCH vs. URNU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCH	URNU.L
Consumer Cyclical	23.4%	-
Financial Services	18.2%	-
Communication Services	14.2%	-
Technology	12.9%	0.9%
Industrials	9.1%	25.4%
Basic Materials	5.5%	4.3%
Healthcare	5.3%	-
Energy	3.7%	60.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	-
Utilities	2.0%	9.0%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

FLCH vs. URNU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 11

URNU.L

URNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
URNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
URNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
URNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
URNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
URNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. URNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCH	URNU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	0.94	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.30	1.55	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.18	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	1.45	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	3.47	-3.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCH vs. URNU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the URNU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and URNU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCH	URNU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11	0.94	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.74	-0.73

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. URNU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than URNU.L's maximum drawdown of -38.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and URNU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCH	URNU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-38.66%	-23.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.14%	-33.08%	+15.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-38.66%	+13.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.20%	-22.80%	-13.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.54%	-11.36%	-19.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.58%	13.83%	-6.25%

Volatility

FLCH vs. URNU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 6.46%, while Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) has a volatility of 16.01%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCH	URNU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.46%	16.01%	-9.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.88%	36.13%	-22.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.31%	50.94%	-31.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.61%	41.21%	-11.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	41.21%	-13.30%

FLCH vs. URNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than URNU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCH vs. URNU.L - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while URNU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.61%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCH and URNU.L in my portfolio?

FLCH and URNU.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLCH or URNU.L?

On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCH or URNU.L?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URNU.L.

What is the main difference between FLCH and URNU.L?

FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while URNU.L is Commodity Producers Equities. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.65% for URNU.L.