FLCH vs. 36BA.DE
FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and 36BA.DE (iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while 36BA.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI Index (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -5.25%/yr vs -2.53%/yr for 36BA.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 36BA.DE.
Performance
FLCH vs. 36BA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLCH is traded in USD, while 36BA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 36BA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than 36BA.DE's -1.87% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- 2.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -5.25%
- 10Y*
- —
36BA.DE
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.73%
- 5Y*
- -2.53%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH vs. 36BA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -9.50% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 35.60% |
36BA.DE iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | -1.87% | 18.98% | -5.53% | 8.78% | -21.63% | -10.20% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and 36BA.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. 36BA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
36BA.DE
FLCH vs. 36BA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36BA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | 36BA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.09 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.67 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | 1.76 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | 36BA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 0.51 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | -0.21 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.04 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. 36BA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than 36BA.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and 36BA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | 36BA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -38.95% | -23.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.14% | -6.75% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -13.15% | -12.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.78% | -36.80% | -18.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.20% | -15.57% | -20.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.54% | -18.54% | -12.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | 2.57% | +5.01% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. 36BA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36BA.DE) at 2.72%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | 36BA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 2.72% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 6.22% | +7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.31% | 8.81% | +10.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.61% | 11.77% | +17.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.91% | 11.29% | +16.62% |
FLCH vs. 36BA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BA.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCH vs. 36BA.DE - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than 36BA.DE's 4.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BA.DE iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) | 4.95% | 4.73% | 4.75% | 4.15% | 2.94% | 1.76% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.61% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCH and 36BA.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 36BA.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
36BA.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.
FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while 36BA.DE is Corporate Bonds. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while 36BA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.17% for 36BA.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLCH and 36BA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer