FIX vs. RYCEY
FIX (Comfort Systems USA, Inc.) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FIX in Engineering & Construction, RYCEY in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, FIX returned 50.73%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIX vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a 98.62% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FIX has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 50.73%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.
FIX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- YTD
- 98.62%
- 6M
- 87.34%
- 1Y
- 263.59%
- 3Y*
- 127.92%
- 5Y*
- 85.83%
- 10Y*
- 50.73%
RYCEY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 38.97%
- 3Y*
- 110.24%
- 5Y*
- 60.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
FIX vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 98.62% | 120.86% | 106.89% | 79.62% | 16.98% | 88.98% | 6.73% | 15.07% | 0.73% | 32.13% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 6.89% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -7.35% | 40.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIX and RYCEY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
FIX:
$65.29B
RYCEY:
$140.58B
FIX:
$34.64
RYCEY:
$0.99
FIX:
53.47
RYCEY:
16.89
FIX:
0.81
RYCEY:
0.03
FIX:
6.45
RYCEY:
3.52
FIX:
23.19
RYCEY:
51.66
FIX:
$10.14B
RYCEY:
$40.04B
FIX:
$2.55B
RYCEY:
$10.10B
FIX:
$1.70B
RYCEY:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIX vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
FIX
RYCEY
FIX vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIX | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.20 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.28 | 1.80 | +17.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.72 | 5.11 | +54.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIX | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98 | 1.04 | +3.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.94 | 1.39 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.20 | 0.16 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | -0.23 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
FIX vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIX | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.36% | -99.07% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -21.75% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.05% | -23.37% | -22.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.05% | -62.01% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.68% | -94.64% | +44.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.28% | -78.78% | +69.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.08% | -84.19% | +46.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 7.65% | -3.19% |
Volatility
FIX vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) has a higher volatility of 12.60% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 11.26%. This indicates that FIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIX | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.60% | 11.26% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.27% | 32.56% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.46% | 37.74% | +15.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.49% | 43.44% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.35% | 49.35% | -7.00% |
Dividends
FIX vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than RYCEY's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.28% | 0.41% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.88% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.76% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
Financials
FIX vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIX vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison
FIX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 754.41M and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
FIX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.72M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
FIX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 370.38M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FIX and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIX has higher volatility (12.60%) compared to RYCEY (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIX dropped -93.36% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIX and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer