FIVA vs. AAPL
FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 12.17%/yr vs 19.46%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIVA vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIVA having a 11.65% return and AAPL slightly lower at 11.12%.
FIVA
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 6M
- 16.62%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- —
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 19.46%
- 10Y*
- 29.63%
FIVA vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 11.65% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | -1.78% | 19.78% | -18.62% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 11.12% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -10.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVA and AAPL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVA vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
FIVA
AAPL
FIVA vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIVA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.53 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.27 | 8.89 | +2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIVA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.18 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.71 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.44 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
FIVA vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -81.80% | +42.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -13.80% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -33.36% | +18.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.70% | -33.36% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -4.33% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -29.60% | +21.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 5.48% | -2.48% |
Volatility
FIVA vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) is 4.87%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that FIVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVA | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 5.68% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 15.99% | -3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 22.41% | -6.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 27.47% | -11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 28.91% | -10.99% |
Dividends
FIVA vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than AAPL's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.55% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIVA and AAPL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to FIVA (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVA and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer