FITB vs. WSM
FITB (Fifth Third Bancorp) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. FITB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FITB returned 14.81%/yr vs 25.88%/yr for WSM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FITB vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FITB achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 14.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FITB has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 14.81%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.88% annualized return.
FITB
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 6M
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 36.57%
- 3Y*
- 30.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
WSM
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 14.19%
- 6M
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 30.20%
- 3Y*
- 50.28%
- 5Y*
- 21.62%
- 10Y*
- 25.88%
FITB vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 12.00% | 14.75% | 27.20% | 10.41% | -21.94% | 62.46% | -5.43% | 35.20% | -20.32% | 15.02% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 14.19% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITB and WSM is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, FITB and WSM have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FITB:
$43.14B
WSM:
$24.28B
FITB:
$3.06
WSM:
$8.93
FITB:
17.00
WSM:
22.68
FITB:
2.71
WSM:
3.13
FITB:
1.35
WSM:
12.98
FITB:
$13.66B
WSM:
$7.88B
FITB:
$9.10B
WSM:
$3.63B
FITB:
$3.03B
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITB vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
FITB
WSM
FITB vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FITB | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.17 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.30 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 2.96 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITB | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 0.90 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.49 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.59 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.34 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
FITB vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITB drawdown since its inception was -98.13%, which is greater than WSM's maximum drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITB and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITB | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.13% | -89.01% | -9.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.21% | -23.27% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.95% | -36.79% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.68% | -51.92% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.06% | -59.71% | -4.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -7.87% | +3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.45% | -25.04% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.57% | 10.24% | -2.67% |
Volatility
FITB vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) is 8.36%, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a volatility of 10.77%. This indicates that FITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITB | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 10.77% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.29% | 24.49% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 33.72% | -7.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.95% | 44.64% | -12.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.30% | 44.20% | -7.90% |
Dividends
FITB vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
FITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than WSM's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 3.02% | 3.29% | 3.41% | 3.94% | 3.84% | 2.62% | 3.92% | 3.06% | 3.14% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 2.59% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.35% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
FITB vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fifth Third Bancorp and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FITB vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
FITB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a gross profit of 2.60B and revenue of 3.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
FITB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported an operating income of 207.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
FITB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a net income of 165.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FITB and WSM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WSM has higher volatility (10.77%) compared to FITB (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITB dropped -98.13% vs WSM's -89.01%.
FITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FITB and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer