PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FIE.TO (iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIE.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Can Equity Tgt Alloc NR CAD, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FIE.TO returned 11.60%/yr vs 16.09%/yr for ZEB.TO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIE.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.

Performance

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIE.TO achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 21.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FIE.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 11.60%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.

FIE.TO

1D
0.09%
1M
2.67%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.51%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
23.93%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
11.60%

ZEB.TO

1D
0.59%
1M
5.70%
YTD
21.69%
6M
24.57%
1Y
62.87%
3Y*
33.95%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
16.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIE.TO
iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF		9.86%24.36%27.62%12.58%-14.35%27.34%1.33%18.97%-9.12%12.01%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF		21.69%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FIE.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2010

0.87

The correlation between FIE.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FIE.TO
ZEB.TO

Financial Services

94.1%
100.0%

Real Estate

5.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FIE.TO
94.1%
ZEB.TO
100.0%

Real Estate

FIE.TO
5.9%
ZEB.TO

-

Basic Materials

FIE.TO

-

ZEB.TO

-

Communication Services

FIE.TO

-

ZEB.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

FIE.TO

-

ZEB.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

FIE.TO

-

ZEB.TO

-

Energy

FIE.TO

-

ZEB.TO

-

Healthcare

FIE.TO

-

ZEB.TO

-

Industrials

FIE.TO

-

ZEB.TO

-

Technology

FIE.TO

-

ZEB.TO

-

Utilities

FIE.TO

-

ZEB.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF

BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Often compared with FIE.TO:
FIE.TO vs. XEI.TOFIE.TO vs. XEQT.TOFIE.TO vs. XDIV.TOFIE.TO vs. XFN.TOFIE.TO vs. HMAX.TOFIE.TO vs. VDY.TOFIE.TO vs. FTN.TO
Often compared with ZEB.TO:
ZEB.TO vs. ZWB.TOZEB.TO vs. VDY.TOZEB.TO vs. HBNK.TOZEB.TO vs. HCAL.TOZEB.TO vs. HMAX.TOZEB.TO vs. ZSP.TOZEB.TO vs. XIC.TO

Return for Risk

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FIE.TO
FIE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FIE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FIE.TOZEB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.16
4.97

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.30
6.76

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.93

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

7.49

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.80

32.20

-19.39

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is lower than the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIE.TO and ZEB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FIE.TOZEB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

4.97

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

1.40

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.96

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.89

-0.19

Drawdowns

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.24%, which is greater than ZEB.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIE.TO and ZEB.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FIE.TOZEB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.24%

-39.69%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-8.44%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.70%

-14.80%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.93%

-25.97%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.24%

-39.69%

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-5.65%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.96%

+0.25%

Volatility

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO) is 2.86%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that FIE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FIE.TOZEB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

4.62%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

11.04%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.99%

12.74%

-3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

13.53%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.09%

16.91%

-2.82%

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIE.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

FIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than ZEB.TO's 2.48% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIE.TO
iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF		4.53%4.94%5.83%6.98%7.31%5.92%7.10%6.65%7.38%6.28%6.59%7.43%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF		2.48%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

FIE.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FIE.TO.

FIE.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. FIE.TO tracks Morningstar Can Equity Tgt Alloc NR CAD, while ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FIE.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIE.TO and ZEB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer