PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICO vs. ULVR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FICO vs. ULVR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Unilever PLC (ULVR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FICO is traded in USD, while ULVR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ULVR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -28.59% return, which is significantly lower than ULVR.L's -13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FICO has outperformed ULVR.L with an annualized return of 26.67%, while ULVR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.45% annualized return.


FICO

1D
6.16%
1M
7.22%
YTD
-28.59%
6M
-31.42%
1Y
-31.98%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*
26.67%

ULVR.L

1D
0.11%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
-13.04%
6M
-18.93%
1Y
-18.11%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
4.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICO vs. ULVR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
-28.59%-15.08%71.04%94.46%38.03%-15.14%36.39%100.36%22.06%28.52%
ULVR.L
Unilever PLC
-13.04%5.70%21.67%-0.81%-1.70%-7.65%7.47%13.60%-2.91%41.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FICO and ULVR.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.23

The correlation between FICO and ULVR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FICO:

$28.67B

ULVR.L:

£92.01B

EPS

FICO:

$31.51

ULVR.L:

£4.32

PE Ratio

FICO:

38.32

ULVR.L:

9.70

PEG Ratio

FICO:

2.04

ULVR.L:

1.77

PS Ratio

FICO:

12.90

ULVR.L:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

FICO:

$2.26B

ULVR.L:

£96.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FICO:

$1.90B

ULVR.L:

£42.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

FICO:

$1.16B

ULVR.L:

£20.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICO vs. ULVR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICO
FICO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FICO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FICO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVR.L
ULVR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ULVR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICO vs. ULVR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Unilever PLC (ULVR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FICOULVR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.88

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

-0.66

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

-1.34

+0.16

FICO vs. ULVR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICO Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the ULVR.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICO and ULVR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FICOULVR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

-0.71

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

-0.02

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.21

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.26

+0.23

Drawdowns

FICO vs. ULVR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than ULVR.L's maximum drawdown of -53.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and ULVR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICOULVR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.26%

-53.22%

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.12%

-27.41%

-24.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-27.41%

-33.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.28%

-27.41%

-33.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.28%

-29.13%

-32.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.32%

-25.76%

-23.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-10.30%

-7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.06%

13.46%

+13.60%

Volatility

FICO vs. ULVR.L - Volatility Comparison

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) at 5.58%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICOULVR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.53%

5.58%

+8.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.17%

19.82%

+19.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.75%

25.49%

+25.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.72%

20.97%

+19.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.08%

21.16%

+16.92%

Dividends

FICO vs. ULVR.L - Dividend Comparison

FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ULVR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.07%0.08%
ULVR.L
Unilever PLC
4.04%3.59%3.23%3.95%3.48%3.74%3.31%3.26%3.24%2.95%3.17%2.98%

Financials

FICO vs. ULVR.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
691.68M
20.35B
(FICO) Total Revenue
(ULVR.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FICO values in USD, ULVR.L values in GBp

FICO vs. ULVR.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fair Isaac Corporation and Unilever PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
86.8%
0
Portfolio components
FICO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 600.48M and revenue of 691.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

ULVR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 20.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FICO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 402.47M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.2%.

ULVR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.16B and revenue of 20.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

FICO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 264.46M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.

ULVR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.58B and revenue of 20.35B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FICO and ULVR.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICO and ULVR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer