PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICO vs. NESN.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FICO vs. NESN.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Nestlé S.A. (NESN.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FICO is traded in USD, while NESN.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the NESN.SW values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -28.59% return, which is significantly lower than NESN.SW's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FICO has outperformed NESN.SW with an annualized return of 26.67%, while NESN.SW has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.


FICO

1D
6.16%
1M
7.22%
YTD
-28.59%
6M
-31.42%
1Y
-31.98%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*
26.67%

NESN.SW

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
1.70%
6M
3.22%
1Y
-4.09%
3Y*
-3.42%
5Y*
-1.99%
10Y*
5.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICO vs. NESN.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
-28.59%-15.08%71.04%94.46%38.03%-15.14%36.39%100.36%22.06%28.52%
NESN.SW
Nestlé S.A.
1.70%24.36%-26.18%2.56%-15.00%20.99%12.29%36.91%-2.79%23.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FICO and NESN.SW is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2007

0.15

The correlation between FICO and NESN.SW shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (3 years) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICO vs. NESN.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICO
FICO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FICO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FICO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

NESN.SW
NESN.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
NESN.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESN.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESN.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NESN.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESN.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICO vs. NESN.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Nestlé S.A. (NESN.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FICONESN.SWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.98

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

-0.28

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

-0.52

-0.66

FICO vs. NESN.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICO Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the NESN.SW Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICO and NESN.SW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FICONESN.SWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

-0.22

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

-0.10

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.31

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.39

+0.10

Drawdowns

FICO vs. NESN.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than NESN.SW's maximum drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and NESN.SW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICONESN.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.26%

-40.53%

-38.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.12%

-17.25%

-34.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-32.86%

-28.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.28%

-38.13%

-23.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.28%

-38.13%

-23.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.32%

-19.70%

-29.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-9.37%

-8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.06%

9.50%

+17.56%

Volatility

FICO vs. NESN.SW - Volatility Comparison

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to Nestlé S.A. (NESN.SW) at 5.89%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NESN.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICONESN.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.53%

5.89%

+8.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.17%

15.63%

+23.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.75%

22.84%

+27.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.72%

19.92%

+20.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.08%

18.15%

+19.93%

Dividends

FICO vs. NESN.SW - Dividend Comparison

FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NESN.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.07%0.08%
NESN.SW
Nestlé S.A.
4.04%3.87%4.01%3.03%2.61%2.16%2.59%2.34%2.94%2.74%3.08%2.95%

Financials

FICO vs. NESN.SW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Nestlé S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. FICO values in USD, NESN.SW values in CHF

Frequently Asked Questions


FICO and NESN.SW have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICO and NESN.SW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer