FICO vs. HLMA.L
FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) and HLMA.L (Halma plc) are both stocks. FICO operates in Software - Application (Technology), while HLMA.L operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FICO returned 26.67%/yr vs 17.59%/yr for HLMA.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FICO vs. HLMA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FICO is traded in USD, while HLMA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HLMA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -28.59% return, which is significantly lower than HLMA.L's 32.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FICO has outperformed HLMA.L with an annualized return of 26.67%, while HLMA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 17.59% annualized return.
FICO
- 1D
- 6.16%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- -28.59%
- 6M
- -31.42%
- 1Y
- -31.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 19.71%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
HLMA.L
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 32.29%
- 6M
- 29.81%
- 1Y
- 57.48%
- 3Y*
- 28.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 17.59%
FICO vs. HLMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -28.59% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 38.03% | -15.14% | 36.39% | 100.36% | 22.06% | 28.52% |
HLMA.L Halma plc | 32.29% | 42.52% | 16.72% | 22.94% | -44.39% | 30.29% | 20.15% | 62.62% | 3.28% | 55.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICO and HLMA.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FICO and HLMA.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FICO:
$28.67B
HLMA.L:
£17.89B
FICO:
$31.51
HLMA.L:
£1.46
FICO:
38.32
HLMA.L:
32.33
FICO:
2.04
HLMA.L:
3.11
FICO:
12.90
HLMA.L:
4.49
FICO:
$2.26B
HLMA.L:
£3.98B
FICO:
$1.90B
HLMA.L:
£1.17B
FICO:
$1.16B
HLMA.L:
£936.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICO vs. HLMA.L — Risk / Return Rank
FICO
HLMA.L
FICO vs. HLMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Halma plc (HLMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FICO | HLMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.38 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 3.96 | -4.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 14.76 | -15.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FICO | HLMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 2.18 | -2.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.41 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.65 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.52 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FICO vs. HLMA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than HLMA.L's maximum drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and HLMA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICO | HLMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.26% | -60.44% | -18.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.12% | -14.43% | -37.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -28.38% | -32.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.28% | -49.10% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.28% | -49.10% | -12.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.32% | -3.82% | -45.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.02% | -13.57% | -4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.06% | 3.88% | +23.18% |
Volatility
FICO vs. HLMA.L - Volatility Comparison
Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to Halma plc (HLMA.L) at 9.55%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FICO | HLMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.53% | 9.55% | +4.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.17% | 20.83% | +18.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.75% | 26.27% | +24.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.72% | 28.24% | +12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.08% | 26.95% | +11.13% |
Dividends
FICO vs. HLMA.L - Dividend Comparison
FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLMA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
HLMA.L Halma plc | 0.50% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.98% | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.11% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FICO vs. HLMA.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Halma plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FICO vs. HLMA.L - Profitability Comparison
FICO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 600.48M and revenue of 691.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
HLMA.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halma plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FICO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 402.47M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.2%.
HLMA.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halma plc reported an operating income of 256.90M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
FICO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 264.46M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.
HLMA.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halma plc reported a net income of 186.80M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FICO and HLMA.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FICO and HLMA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer