PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHI vs. AEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FHI vs. AEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and Aegon N.V. (AEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHI achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than AEG's 6.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FHI having a 11.31% annualized return and AEG not far ahead at 11.39%.


FHI

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.79%
YTD
10.86%
6M
14.99%
1Y
38.36%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
11.31%

AEG

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
6.61%
6M
3.66%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
25.46%
5Y*
18.27%
10Y*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHI vs. AEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
10.86%30.45%29.60%-3.72%-0.16%34.68%-3.79%27.07%-23.34%32.26%
AEG
Aegon N.V.
6.61%39.08%8.38%21.19%6.45%29.44%-10.42%5.37%-22.29%20.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FHI and AEG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1998

0.40

The correlation between FHI and AEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FHI:

$4.14B

AEG:

$12.43B

EPS

FHI:

$5.35

AEG:

$1.07

PE Ratio

FHI:

10.65

AEG:

7.66

PEG Ratio

FHI:

0.50

AEG:

0.22

PS Ratio

FHI:

2.28

AEG:

0.28

PB Ratio

FHI:

2.66

AEG:

1.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

FHI:

$1.86B

AEG:

$45.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FHI:

$958.45M

AEG:

$45.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

FHI:

$564.21M

AEG:

$1.06B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHI vs. AEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHI
FHI Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AEG
AEG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEG Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHI vs. AEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and Aegon N.V. (AEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHIAEGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.16

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.31

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

3.77

+5.76

FHI vs. AEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the AEG Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHI and AEG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHIAEGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

0.81

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.60

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.32

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.21

+0.07

Drawdowns

FHI vs. AEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHI drawdown since its inception was -64.89%, smaller than the maximum AEG drawdown of -94.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHI and AEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHIAEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.89%

-94.91%

+30.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-15.65%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.17%

-18.37%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.61%

-36.56%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.89%

-71.11%

+6.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-63.55%

+61.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-52.67%

+36.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

5.45%

-1.41%

Volatility

FHI vs. AEG - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Aegon N.V. (AEG) at 6.03%. This indicates that FHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHIAEGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

6.03%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.64%

20.38%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

25.40%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.87%

30.81%

-5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.44%

35.66%

-3.22%

Dividends

FHI vs. AEG - Dividend Comparison

FHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than AEG's 5.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEG
Aegon N.V.
5.37%5.72%5.93%4.89%4.08%3.37%1.80%7.37%7.02%4.74%5.30%4.72%
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
2.46%2.55%5.38%3.38%2.97%2.87%7.20%3.31%3.99%2.77%7.07%3.49%

Financials

FHI vs. AEG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federated Hermes, Inc. and Aegon N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00B-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
478.96M
19.00B
(FHI) Total Revenue
(AEG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FHI vs. AEG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federated Hermes, Inc. and Aegon N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
100.0%
Portfolio components
FHI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federated Hermes, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 478.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AEG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aegon N.V. reported a gross profit of 19.00B and revenue of 19.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

FHI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federated Hermes, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.33M and revenue of 478.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.4%.

AEG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aegon N.V. reported an operating income of 365.28M and revenue of 19.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.

FHI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federated Hermes, Inc. reported a net income of 95.95M and revenue of 478.96M, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.

AEG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aegon N.V. reported a net income of 389.10M and revenue of 19.00B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FHI and AEG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHI has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to AEG (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHI dropped -64.89% vs AEG's -94.91%.

FHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHI and AEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer