FGRTX vs. DRAM
FGRTX (Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both funds - FGRTX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGRTX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.
Performance
FGRTX vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FGRTX
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 27.40%
- 3Y*
- 24.66%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 16.16%
DRAM
- 1D
- 8.48%
- 1M
- 14.62%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGRTX vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund | 9.74% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 124.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGRTX and DRAM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGRTX vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank
FGRTX
DRAM
FGRTX vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGRTX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGRTX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 91.43 | -90.96 |
Drawdowns
FGRTX vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGRTX drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRTX and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGRTX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.17% | -19.97% | -36.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -13.18% | +10.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -2.40% | -6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | — | — |
Volatility
FGRTX vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGRTX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.25% | 85.85% | -73.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 85.85% | -69.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 85.85% | -67.72% |
FGRTX vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGRTX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGRTX vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
FGRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund | 3.60% | 3.89% | 2.68% | 2.06% | 4.38% | 4.79% | 7.96% | 12.98% | 21.72% | 15.57% | 1.97% | 4.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGRTX and DRAM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FGRTX and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer