PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFRHX vs. CLF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFRHX vs. CLF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FFRHX is traded in USD, while CLF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRHX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than CLF.TO's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRHX has outperformed CLF.TO with an annualized return of 4.91%, while CLF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.65% annualized return.


FFRHX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.24%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
4.91%

CLF.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-1.09%
6M
0.22%
1Y
0.58%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-1.13%
10Y*
0.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFRHX vs. CLF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
1.82%5.47%7.10%12.63%-1.55%5.01%1.69%8.63%0.10%3.91%
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
-1.09%8.31%-3.36%7.12%-9.71%-1.22%7.37%6.88%-6.20%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRHX and CLF.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2008

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFRHX vs. CLF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRHX
FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CLF.TO
CLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRHX vs. CLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFRHXCLF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.02

+0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

0.17

+4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.53

0.41

+17.11

FFRHX vs. CLF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRHX and CLF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFRHXCLF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

0.12

+2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.89

-0.16

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

0.09

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.06

+1.09

Drawdowns

FFRHX vs. CLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRHX drawdown since its inception was -22.20%, smaller than the maximum CLF.TO drawdown of -27.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRHX and CLF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFRHXCLF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.20%

-27.88%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-3.33%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.29%

-7.33%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.90%

-17.86%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.20%

-18.06%

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-11.63%

+11.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-12.27%

+11.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

1.40%

-1.06%

Volatility

FFRHX vs. CLF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) is 0.63%, while iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that FFRHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFRHXCLF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

1.08%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

3.81%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

4.78%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

7.02%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

7.41%

-3.27%

FFRHX vs. CLF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than CLF.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFRHX vs. CLF.TO - Dividend Comparison

FFRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than CLF.TO's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
2.25%2.22%2.22%2.23%2.10%1.98%2.15%2.46%2.67%2.91%3.12%3.29%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.09%7.41%6.94%8.24%3.81%2.74%3.84%5.15%4.74%4.05%4.44%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFRHX and CLF.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFRHX and CLF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer