PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFIV vs. GWO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FFIV vs. GWO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) and Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FFIV is traded in USD, while GWO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GWO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFIV achieves a 55.21% return, which is significantly higher than GWO.TO's 18.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFIV having a 12.74% annualized return and GWO.TO not far ahead at 13.25%.


FFIV

1D
0.72%
1M
11.91%
YTD
55.21%
6M
59.62%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
12.74%

GWO.TO

1D
-2.37%
1M
3.83%
YTD
18.50%
6M
27.09%
1Y
59.19%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
19.48%
10Y*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFIV vs. GWO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
55.21%1.51%40.50%24.72%-41.36%39.09%25.99%-13.81%23.48%-9.33%
GWO.TO
Great-West Lifeco Inc.
18.50%55.48%5.36%51.29%-17.79%31.51%-0.28%29.88%-22.29%11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FFIV and GWO.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between FFIV and GWO.TO has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FFIV:

$22.70B

GWO.TO:

CA$72.78B

EPS

FFIV:

$12.19

GWO.TO:

CA$4.85

PE Ratio

FFIV:

32.50

GWO.TO:

16.53

PEG Ratio

FFIV:

1.42

GWO.TO:

1.84

PS Ratio

FFIV:

9.54

GWO.TO:

2.13

PB Ratio

FFIV:

6.22

GWO.TO:

2.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

FFIV:

$2.41B

GWO.TO:

CA$34.77B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FFIV:

$2.63B

GWO.TO:

CA$15.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

FFIV:

$889.95M

GWO.TO:

CA$6.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFIV vs. GWO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFIV
FFIV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GWO.TO
GWO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GWO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GWO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFIV vs. GWO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) and Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFIVGWO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.60

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

5.09

-4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

19.10

-16.93

FFIV vs. GWO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the GWO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFIV and GWO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFIVGWO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

3.45

-2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.08

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.61

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.34

-0.07

Drawdowns

FFIV vs. GWO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFIV drawdown since its inception was -97.59%, which is greater than GWO.TO's maximum drawdown of -76.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFIV and GWO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFIVGWO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.59%

-76.31%

-21.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.73%

-11.68%

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.73%

-13.33%

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.42%

-33.34%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.59%

-49.31%

-5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-2.37%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.19%

-14.29%

-25.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.76%

3.11%

+12.65%

Volatility

FFIV vs. GWO.TO - Volatility Comparison

F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO.TO) at 4.85%. This indicates that FFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFIVGWO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

4.85%

+4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.96%

12.77%

+12.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.52%

17.29%

+16.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.02%

18.09%

+11.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.57%

21.96%

+7.61%

Dividends

FFIV vs. GWO.TO - Dividend Comparison

FFIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GWO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GWO.TO
Great-West Lifeco Inc.
3.19%3.60%4.66%4.74%6.26%4.75%5.77%4.97%5.52%4.18%3.94%3.78%

Financials

FFIV vs. GWO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between F5 Networks, Inc. and Great-West Lifeco Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B202220232024202520260
7.73B
(FFIV) Total Revenue
(GWO.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FFIV values in USD, GWO.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


FFIV and GWO.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFIV and GWO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer