FEZ vs. HXQ.TO
FEZ (SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 10.66%/yr vs 21.05%/yr for HXQ.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXQ.TO.
Performance
FEZ vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEZ is traded in USD, while HXQ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HXQ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than HXQ.TO's 16.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed HXQ.TO with an annualized return of 10.66%, while HXQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.05% annualized return.
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 16.40%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- 1Y
- 35.29%
- 3Y*
- 26.98%
- 5Y*
- 16.75%
- 10Y*
- 21.05%
FEZ vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 4.68% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 16.40% | 20.55% | 25.37% | 54.85% | -32.14% | 26.26% | 49.12% | 37.94% | -1.57% | 32.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and HXQ.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016 | 0.45 |
The correlation between FEZ and HXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEZ vs. HXQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Industrials
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Technology
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Healthcare
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Energy
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Utilities
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Basic Materials
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Communication Services
FEZ
HXQ.TO
Real Estate
FEZ
-
HXQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
HXQ.TO
FEZ vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEZ | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.38 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.96 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 11.09 | -7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEZ | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.09 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.78 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.98 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.97 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than HXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and HXQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -35.78% | -28.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -11.98% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -22.85% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -35.78% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -35.78% | -3.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.79% | -4.21% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.07% | -6.35% | -10.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 3.19% | +0.81% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 5.64%, while Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 6.64% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 13.11% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 17.01% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 21.59% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 21.56% | -0.44% |
FEZ vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEZ vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.58% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEZ and HXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while HXQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Horizons. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and HXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer