FEAM vs. MTN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FEAM (5E Advanced Materials Inc) and MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) are both stocks. FEAM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while MTN operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, FEAM returned -73.72%/yr vs -12.71%/yr for MTN. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FEAM vs. MTN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAM achieves a -44.59% return, which is significantly lower than MTN's 5.09% return.

FEAM

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 5.63%
• YTD: -44.59%
• 6M: -57.43%
• 1Y: -60.70%
• 3Y*: -73.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MTN

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 9.40%
• YTD: 5.09%
• 6M: -1.45%
• 1Y: -2.97%
• 3Y*: -12.71%
• 5Y*: -12.18%
• 10Y*: 2.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAM vs. MTN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc	-44.59%	-79.28%	-54.61%	-82.11%	-76.13%
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc.	5.09%	-24.88%	-7.96%	-7.06%	-1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAM and MTN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2022	0.15

Fundamentals

EPS FEAM : -$1.76 MTN : $5.62
Total Revenue (TTM) FEAM : $0.00 MTN : $2.83B
Gross Profit (TTM) FEAM : -$10.56M MTN : $2.12B
EBITDA (TTM) FEAM : -$22.23M MTN : $499.82M

Return for Risk

FEAM vs. MTN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAM

FEAM Risk / Return Rank: 19
FEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 16

MTN

MTN Risk / Return Rank: 37
MTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MTN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MTN Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAM vs. MTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEAM	MTN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	-0.09	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.40	0.11	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.01	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	-0.11	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	-0.20	-0.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEAM vs. MTN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the MTN Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAM and MTN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEAM	MTN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.53	-0.09	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.70	0.21	-0.91

Drawdowns

FEAM vs. MTN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAM drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than MTN's maximum drawdown of -77.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAM and MTN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAM	MTN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.84%	-77.54%	-22.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.66%	-26.40%	-56.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.85%	-45.73%	-53.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.78%	-55.24%	-44.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.41%	-26.12%	-60.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.86%	14.74%	+37.12%

Volatility

FEAM vs. MTN - Volatility Comparison

5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) has a higher volatility of 39.16% compared to Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) at 6.59%. This indicates that FEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAM	MTN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.16%	6.59%	+32.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.83%	26.27%	+48.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	114.92%	33.65%	+81.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.78%	31.70%	+78.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.78%	32.29%	+77.49%

Dividends

FEAM vs. MTN - Dividend Comparison

FEAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEAM 5E Advanced Materials Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc.	6.47%	6.69%	4.74%	3.86%	3.21%	0.54%	0.63%	2.94%	2.79%	1.98%	2.01%	1.95%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAM and MTN in my portfolio?

FEAM and MTN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAM or MTN?

FEAM has higher volatility (39.16%) compared to MTN (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAM dropped -99.84% vs MTN's -77.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.