FDVV vs. SCHY
FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and SCHY (Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while SCHY is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVV returned 13.25%/yr vs 7.76%/yr for SCHY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHY.
Performance
FDVV vs. SCHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDVV having a 7.59% return and SCHY slightly lower at 7.47%.
FDVV
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHY
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- —
FDVV vs. SCHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 7.59% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 10.53% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 7.47% | 33.98% | -1.79% | 14.27% | -9.43% | 4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVV and SCHY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FDVV and SCHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDVV vs. SCHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDVV
SCHY
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
FDVV
SCHY
Financial Services
FDVV
SCHY
Consumer Cyclical
FDVV
SCHY
Consumer Defensive
FDVV
SCHY
Real Estate
FDVV
SCHY
Utilities
FDVV
SCHY
Communication Services
FDVV
SCHY
Industrials
FDVV
SCHY
Healthcare
FDVV
SCHY
Basic Materials
FDVV
-
SCHY
Energy
FDVV
-
SCHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDVV vs. SCHY — Risk / Return Rank
FDVV
SCHY
FDVV vs. SCHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDVV | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.31 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.33 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 7.31 | +2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDVV | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.78 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.59 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.65 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
FDVV vs. SCHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, which is greater than SCHY's maximum drawdown of -24.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and SCHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVV | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.25% | -24.04% | -16.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -9.11% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.90% | -12.16% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | -24.04% | +3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -5.55% | +3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -4.97% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.90% | -0.66% |
Volatility
FDVV vs. SCHY - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDVV | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 2.83% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 9.86% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.07% | 11.96% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 13.26% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 13.23% | +3.76% |
FDVV vs. SCHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDVV vs. SCHY - Dividend Comparison
FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than SCHY's 3.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.74% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 3.45% | 3.55% | 4.64% | 3.97% | 3.67% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDVV and SCHY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVV has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to SCHY (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs SCHY's -24.04%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.25% vs 7.76% for SCHY. On fees, SCHY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.
SCHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 2.74% for FDVV.
FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHY is Dividend. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while SCHY tracks Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.08% for SCHY.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDVV and SCHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer