FDVV vs. ACWX
FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVV returned 13.25%/yr vs 7.87%/yr for ACWX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWX.
Performance
FDVV vs. ACWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than ACWX's 11.20% return.
FDVV
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
FDVV vs. ACWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 7.59% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 11.20% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVV and ACWX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.77 |
The correlation between FDVV and ACWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDVV vs. ACWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDVV
ACWX
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
FDVV
ACWX
Financial Services
FDVV
ACWX
Consumer Cyclical
FDVV
ACWX
Consumer Defensive
FDVV
ACWX
Real Estate
FDVV
ACWX
Utilities
FDVV
ACWX
Communication Services
FDVV
ACWX
Industrials
FDVV
ACWX
Healthcare
FDVV
ACWX
Basic Materials
FDVV
-
ACWX
Energy
FDVV
-
ACWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDVV vs. ACWX — Risk / Return Rank
FDVV
ACWX
FDVV vs. ACWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDVV | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.31 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.38 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 9.17 | +0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDVV | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.70 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.48 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.22 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
FDVV vs. ACWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum ACWX drawdown of -60.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and ACWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVV | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.25% | -60.40% | +20.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -11.42% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.90% | -13.84% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | -30.07% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -3.74% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -13.33% | +9.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.95% | -0.71% |
Volatility
FDVV vs. ACWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is 2.96%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that FDVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDVV | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 6.26% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 13.90% | -5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.07% | 16.05% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 16.38% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.42% | -0.43% |
FDVV vs. ACWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDVV vs. ACWX - Dividend Comparison
FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than ACWX's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.54% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.74% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDVV and ACWX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to FDVV (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs ACWX's -60.40%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.25% vs 7.87% for ACWX. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.54% for ACWX.
FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ACWX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.32% for ACWX.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDVV and ACWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer