PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDHY vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDHY vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDHY achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 40.38% return.


FDHY

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.60%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*

TNA

1D
2.58%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
40.38%
6M
32.71%
1Y
101.66%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
-7.95%
10Y*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDHY vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
1.77%9.24%7.53%11.14%-11.30%4.33%10.71%16.87%-2.35%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
40.38%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-51.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FDHY and TNA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.62

The correlation between FDHY and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDHY vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDHY
TNA

Energy

100.0%
6.2%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.4%

Financial Services

-

15.9%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Industrials

-

17.5%

Real Estate

-

6.2%

Technology

-

16.9%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Energy

FDHY
100.0%
TNA
6.2%

Basic Materials

FDHY

-

TNA
4.8%

Communication Services

FDHY

-

TNA
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FDHY

-

TNA
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDHY

-

TNA
2.4%

Financial Services

FDHY

-

TNA
15.9%

Healthcare

FDHY

-

TNA
16.5%

Industrials

FDHY

-

TNA
17.5%

Real Estate

FDHY

-

TNA
6.2%

Technology

FDHY

-

TNA
16.9%

Utilities

FDHY

-

TNA
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDHY vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDHY
FDHY Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FDHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FDHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDHY vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDHYTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.27

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

3.14

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.71

10.30

+5.40

FDHY vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDHY and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDHYTNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.76

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

-0.12

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.22

+0.49

Drawdowns

FDHY vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDHY drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDHY and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDHYTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-88.09%

+68.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.12%

-32.53%

+30.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.26%

-65.78%

+60.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

-82.36%

+65.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-40.63%

+40.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-33.91%

+31.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

9.90%

-9.40%

Volatility

FDHY vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) is 1.18%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 19.70%. This indicates that FDHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDHYTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

19.70%

-18.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

41.78%

-39.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

58.10%

-54.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

67.48%

-60.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.04%

68.52%

-60.48%

FDHY vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDHY has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDHY vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

FDHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than TNA's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
6.55%6.56%6.58%6.26%5.34%6.09%5.78%4.94%2.55%0.00%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.43%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDHY and TNA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (19.70%) compared to FDHY (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDHY dropped -20.01% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 5-year performance, FDHY leads with 3.85% vs -7.95% for TNA. On fees, FDHY is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDHY has performed better with a 3.85% return vs -7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDHY is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

FDHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 0.43% for TNA.

FDHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDHY and 1.14% for TNA.

FDHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDHY and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer