FCNVX vs. CLF.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FCNVX (Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class) and CLF.TO (iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF) are both funds - FCNVX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while CLF.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD. Over the past 10 years, FCNVX returned 2.58%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CLF.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCNVX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for CLF.TO.

Performance

FCNVX vs. CLF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FCNVX is traded in USD, while CLF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNVX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than CLF.TO's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNVX has outperformed CLF.TO with an annualized return of 2.58%, while CLF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.65% annualized return.

FCNVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.85%
• 1Y: 4.24%
• 3Y*: 5.03%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: 2.58%

CLF.TO

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: -1.09%
• 6M: 0.22%
• 1Y: 0.58%
• 3Y*: 2.76%
• 5Y*: -1.13%
• 10Y*: 0.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNVX vs. CLF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	1.50%	4.51%	5.43%	5.86%	0.85%	-0.06%	1.10%	3.00%	1.82%	1.42%
CLF.TO iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF	-1.09%	8.31%	-3.36%	7.12%	-9.71%	-1.22%	7.37%	6.88%	-6.20%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNVX and CLF.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2011	0.08

Return for Risk

FCNVX vs. CLF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNVX

FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

CLF.TO

CLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 41
CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
CLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
CLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNVX vs. CLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCNVX	CLF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	0.12	+3.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	23.50	0.22	+23.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	13.78	1.02	+12.76
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	41.82	0.17	+41.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	153.67	0.41	+153.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCNVX vs. CLF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNVX and CLF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCNVX	CLF.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52	0.12	+3.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.78	-0.16	+2.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.48	0.09	+2.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.20	0.06	+2.15

Drawdowns

FCNVX vs. CLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNVX drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum CLF.TO drawdown of -27.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNVX and CLF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCNVX	CLF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-27.88%	+25.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-3.33%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.30%	-7.33%	+7.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.59%	-17.86%	+17.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-2.19%	-18.06%	+15.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.63%	+11.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-12.27%	+12.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	1.40%	-1.37%

Volatility

FCNVX vs. CLF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) is 0.33%, while iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that FCNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCNVX	CLF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	1.08%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.78%	3.81%	-3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18%	4.78%	-3.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.29%	7.02%	-5.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.04%	7.41%	-6.37%

FCNVX vs. CLF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNVX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CLF.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FCNVX vs. CLF.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than CLF.TO's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLF.TO iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF	2.25%	2.22%	2.22%	2.23%	2.10%	1.98%	2.15%	2.46%	2.67%	2.91%	3.12%	3.29%
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	4.15%	4.41%	5.17%	4.97%	1.24%	0.24%	0.99%	2.45%	2.21%	1.30%	1.01%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCNVX and CLF.TO in my portfolio?

FCNVX and CLF.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.