PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBMPX vs. ARKK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBMPX vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBMPX achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's -1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FBMPX has outperformed ARKK with an annualized return of 16.89%, while ARKK has yielded a comparatively lower 15.39% annualized return.


FBMPX

1D
-2.81%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
6.97%
6M
7.58%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
33.06%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
16.89%

ARKK

1D
1.87%
1M
-4.10%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-7.42%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
-7.38%
10Y*
15.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBMPX vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBMPX
Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio
6.97%37.07%35.98%56.85%-38.30%15.97%35.48%33.14%-3.52%12.60%
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
-1.35%35.49%8.40%69.04%-66.97%-23.60%152.71%35.08%3.52%87.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FBMPX and ARKK is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014

0.66

The correlation between FBMPX and ARKK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBMPX vs. ARKK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBMPX
ARKK

Communication Services

83.1%
10.9%

Technology

13.1%
26.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.8%
13.7%

Healthcare

0.7%
27.4%

Industrials

0.3%
6.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

15.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

FBMPX
83.1%
ARKK
10.9%

Technology

FBMPX
13.1%
ARKK
26.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FBMPX
2.8%
ARKK
13.7%

Healthcare

FBMPX
0.7%
ARKK
27.4%

Industrials

FBMPX
0.3%
ARKK
6.3%

Basic Materials

FBMPX

-

ARKK

-

Consumer Defensive

FBMPX

-

ARKK

-

Energy

FBMPX

-

ARKK

-

Financial Services

FBMPX

-

ARKK
15.4%

Real Estate

FBMPX

-

ARKK

-

Utilities

FBMPX

-

ARKK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBMPX vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBMPX
FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKK
ARKK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ARKK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKK Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBMPX vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBMPXARKKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

0.77

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

1.71

+6.03

FBMPX vs. ARKK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the ARKK Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBMPX and ARKK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBMPXARKKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

0.67

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

-0.16

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.38

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.34

+0.31

Drawdowns

FBMPX vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBMPX drawdown since its inception was -61.77%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBMPX and ARKK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBMPXARKKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.77%

-80.97%

+19.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.90%

-31.35%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.20%

-39.56%

+16.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.42%

-77.23%

+29.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.42%

-80.97%

+33.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.72%

-50.87%

+45.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-30.14%

+19.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

14.18%

-9.70%

Volatility

FBMPX vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) is 5.19%, while ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a volatility of 11.34%. This indicates that FBMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBMPXARKKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

11.34%

-6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

25.96%

-11.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

36.15%

-16.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.28%

46.38%

-23.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.98%

40.34%

-18.36%

FBMPX vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBMPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBMPX vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison

FBMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, while ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.70%0.00%0.55%1.64%0.38%3.14%1.32%0.00%2.27%
FBMPX
Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio
12.52%8.09%7.05%0.00%0.00%5.88%3.74%35.43%15.29%5.53%7.50%7.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBMPX and ARKK have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKK has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to FBMPX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBMPX dropped -61.77% vs ARKK's -80.97%.

FBMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBMPX and ARKK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer