FBIN vs. TT
FBIN (Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.) and TT (Trane Technologies plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FBIN in Building Products & Equipment, TT in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, FBIN returned -0.64%/yr vs 23.62%/yr for TT. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FBIN vs. TT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBIN achieves a -20.14% return, which is significantly lower than TT's 18.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FBIN has underperformed TT with an annualized return of -0.64%, while TT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.62% annualized return.
FBIN
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- -20.14%
- 6M
- -19.43%
- 1Y
- -21.18%
- 3Y*
- -14.22%
- 5Y*
- -13.00%
- 10Y*
- -0.64%
TT
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 18.47%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 7.99%
- 3Y*
- 39.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.82%
- 10Y*
- 23.62%
FBIN vs. TT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | -20.14% | -25.41% | -9.12% | 35.25% | -36.48% | 26.02% | 32.92% | 74.91% | -43.66% | 29.52% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 18.47% | 6.38% | 52.97% | 47.39% | -15.34% | 41.02% | 11.26% | 48.32% | 4.41% | 21.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBIN and TT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FBIN and TT shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FBIN:
$2.15
TT:
$12.94
FBIN:
18.36
TT:
35.48
FBIN:
1.07
TT:
4.76
FBIN:
$3.36B
TT:
$21.60B
FBIN:
$1.53B
TT:
$7.76B
FBIN:
$484.60M
TT:
$4.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBIN vs. TT — Risk / Return Rank
FBIN
TT
FBIN vs. TT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBIN | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.08 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 0.40 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 0.79 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBIN | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 0.30 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.80 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.84 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.47 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
FBIN vs. TT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBIN drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, smaller than the maximum TT drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBIN and TT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBIN | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.42% | -77.91% | +15.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.93% | -19.97% | -27.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.90% | -24.44% | -37.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.90% | -40.53% | -21.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.42% | -51.13% | -11.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.26% | -6.61% | -48.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -14.84% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.40% | 10.09% | +12.31% |
Volatility
FBIN vs. TT - Volatility Comparison
Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) has a higher volatility of 11.51% compared to Trane Technologies plc (TT) at 7.45%. This indicates that FBIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBIN | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.51% | 7.45% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.66% | 21.06% | +14.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.72% | 26.97% | +15.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.50% | 27.28% | +9.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.05% | 28.30% | +6.75% |
Dividends
FBIN vs. TT - Dividend Comparison
FBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than TT's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | 2.58% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 1.68% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.35% | 2.11% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.01% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 0.87% | 0.97% | 0.91% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% |
Financials
FBIN vs. TT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. and Trane Technologies plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FBIN vs. TT - Profitability Comparison
FBIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of -66.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
FBIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported an operating income of -61.40M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.8%.
TT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
FBIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a net income of -52.20M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.
TT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FBIN and TT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBIN has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to TT (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBIN dropped -62.42% vs TT's -77.91%.
TT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBIN and TT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer