PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAPCX vs. PRSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAPCX vs. PRSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund (FAPCX) and T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund (PRSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAPCX having a 4.12% return and PRSIX slightly higher at 4.22%.


FAPCX

1D
-4.91%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
4.12%
6M
5.85%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*

PRSIX

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
4.22%
6M
4.82%
1Y
12.32%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
6.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAPCX vs. PRSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAPCX
Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund
4.12%18.82%8.28%27.54%-26.25%12.43%22.82%33.52%-12.55%15.61%
PRSIX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund
4.22%11.91%8.53%11.97%-13.65%7.07%11.70%16.78%-3.01%5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPCX and PRSIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017

0.87

The correlation between FAPCX and PRSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAPCX vs. PRSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPCX
FAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSIX
PRSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PRSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPCX vs. PRSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund (FAPCX) and T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund (PRSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAPCXPRSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.41

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

2.50

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.80

11.15

-9.35

FAPCX vs. PRSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the PRSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPCX and PRSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAPCXPRSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

2.09

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.63

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.86

-0.33

Drawdowns

FAPCX vs. PRSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPCX drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than PRSIX's maximum drawdown of -30.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPCX and PRSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAPCXPRSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.09%

-30.00%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.45%

-5.02%

-9.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

-6.80%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.09%

-18.69%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

-1.49%

-3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-2.82%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

1.12%

+2.68%

Volatility

FAPCX vs. PRSIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund (FAPCX) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund (PRSIX) at 2.16%. This indicates that FAPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAPCXPRSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

2.16%

+5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

5.08%

+10.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

6.00%

+11.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

7.07%

+11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

7.42%

+11.23%

FAPCX vs. PRSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPCX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSIX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAPCX vs. PRSIX - Dividend Comparison

FAPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than PRSIX's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAPCX
Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund
9.10%9.48%2.94%0.42%0.40%8.83%0.41%0.87%0.81%1.95%0.00%0.00%
PRSIX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund
6.95%7.12%3.92%3.78%5.63%7.63%3.77%5.11%5.27%3.43%2.22%4.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FAPCX and PRSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAPCX has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to PRSIX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPCX dropped -37.09% vs PRSIX's -30.00%.

PRSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAPCX and PRSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer