FANG vs. XOM
FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — FANG in Oil & Gas E&P, XOM in Oil & Gas Integrated. Over the past 10 years, FANG returned 11.24%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for XOM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FANG vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 33.36% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 27.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed XOM with an annualized return of 11.24%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.04% annualized return.
FANG
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 33.36%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 22.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
XOM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 27.80%
- 6M
- 32.61%
- 1Y
- 50.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
FANG vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 33.36% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 27.80% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and XOM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012 | 0.63 |
The correlation between FANG and XOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FANG:
$56.05B
XOM:
$634.77B
FANG:
$1.40
XOM:
$5.93
FANG:
141.45
XOM:
25.60
FANG:
3.75
XOM:
1.99
FANG:
1.54
XOM:
2.50
FANG:
$15.19B
XOM:
$326.01B
FANG:
$7.30B
XOM:
$83.11B
FANG:
$5.54B
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANG vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
FANG
XOM
FANG vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FANG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 3.21 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 8.97 | -1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FANG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 2.07 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.90 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.36 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.48 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FANG vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -62.40% | -26.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -15.69% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.10% | -18.92% | -23.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.10% | -20.51% | -21.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.72% | -61.34% | -27.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.74% | -10.90% | +4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.39% | -10.20% | -9.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 5.61% | +0.72% |
Volatility
FANG vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 11.35% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 9.20%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FANG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.35% | 9.20% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.88% | 20.29% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.51% | 24.44% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.98% | 26.73% | +11.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.06% | 28.19% | +20.87% |
Dividends
FANG vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than XOM's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.09% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.69% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
FANG vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FANG vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FANG and XOM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANG has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to XOM (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FANG dropped -88.72% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FANG and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer