F vs. HBM
F (Ford Motor Company) and HBM (Hudbay Minerals Inc.) are both stocks. F operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while HBM operates in Copper (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, F returned 6.32%/yr vs 18.60%/yr for HBM. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
F vs. HBM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, F achieves a 17.02% return, which is significantly lower than HBM's 31.58% return. Over the past 10 years, F has underperformed HBM with an annualized return of 6.32%, while HBM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.60% annualized return.
F
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 23.29%
- YTD
- 17.02%
- 6M
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 53.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
HBM
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 31.58%
- 6M
- 50.45%
- 1Y
- 171.66%
- 3Y*
- 77.46%
- 5Y*
- 30.42%
- 10Y*
- 18.60%
F vs. HBM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 17.02% | 42.35% | -13.10% | 10.18% | -42.18% | 137.48% | -3.88% | 29.64% | -34.35% | 8.73% |
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 31.58% | 145.46% | 47.03% | 9.24% | -29.87% | 3.82% | 69.50% | -11.77% | -46.20% | 54.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between F and HBM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2009 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
F:
$61.07B
HBM:
$10.41B
F:
-$1.52
HBM:
$1.65
F:
0.32
HBM:
4.39
F:
1.63
HBM:
2.94
F:
$189.86B
HBM:
$2.37B
F:
$17.42B
HBM:
$828.54M
F:
$9.99B
HBM:
$1.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
F vs. HBM — Risk / Return Rank
F
HBM
F vs. HBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (F) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| F | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.41 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.78 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | 15.13 | -8.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| F | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.96 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.55 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.32 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.20 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
F vs. HBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum F drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than HBM's maximum drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F and HBM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| F | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -92.21% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.31% | -36.16% | +13.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.51% | -41.11% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.62% | -63.33% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.77% | -86.34% | +21.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.81% | -18.07% | -15.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.70% | -52.50% | +7.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.42% | 11.40% | -2.98% |
Volatility
F vs. HBM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ford Motor Company (F) is 21.84%, while Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a volatility of 25.29%. This indicates that F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| F | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.84% | 25.29% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.26% | 46.90% | -17.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.21% | 58.55% | -21.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.41% | 55.36% | -15.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.48% | 58.79% | -21.31% |
Dividends
F vs. HBM - Dividend Comparison
F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than HBM's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 4.00% | 5.72% | 7.88% | 4.92% | 4.30% | 0.48% | 1.71% | 6.45% | 9.54% | 5.20% | 7.01% | 4.26% |
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.22% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.52% |
Financials
F vs. HBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and Hudbay Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
F vs. HBM - Profitability Comparison
F - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.
HBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 340.81M and revenue of 745.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.
F - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
HBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 297.62M and revenue of 745.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.9%.
F - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
HBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 187.76M and revenue of 745.43M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
F and HBM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HBM has higher volatility (25.29%) compared to F (21.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, F dropped -97.07% vs HBM's -92.21%.
HBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for F and HBM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer