PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXPE vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EXPE vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXPE achieves a -19.92% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -23.22% return.


EXPE

1D
-1.30%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
-19.92%
6M
-14.20%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
27.45%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
8.33%

PLTR

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-24.81%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
108.67%
5Y*
41.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXPE vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EXPE
Expedia Group, Inc.
-19.92%53.27%22.76%73.28%-51.53%36.50%44.26%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-23.22%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EXPE and PLTR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.33

The correlation between EXPE and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EXPE:

$27.52B

PLTR:

$350.85B

EPS

EXPE:

$12.11

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

EXPE:

18.65

PLTR:

153.57

PEG Ratio

EXPE:

0.41

PLTR:

0.89

PS Ratio

EXPE:

1.91

PLTR:

67.07

PB Ratio

EXPE:

47.78

PLTR:

41.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

EXPE:

$15.17B

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EXPE:

$13.48B

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

EXPE:

$2.94B

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXPE vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXPE
EXPE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EXPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXPE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EXPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXPE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXPE vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXPEPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.18

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

0.33

+1.68

EXPE vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXPE and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXPEPLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.14

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.64

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.86

-0.58

Drawdowns

EXPE vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXPE drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXPE and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXPEPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.73%

-84.62%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.44%

-38.19%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.44%

-40.61%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.86%

-79.14%

+18.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.71%

-34.13%

+9.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.32%

-40.29%

+16.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.43%

20.71%

-6.28%

Volatility

EXPE vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) is 11.68%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.24%. This indicates that EXPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXPEPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.68%

17.24%

-5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.31%

38.35%

-2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.45%

50.93%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.76%

65.44%

-19.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.84%

69.81%

-25.97%

Dividends

EXPE vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

EXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXPE
Expedia Group, Inc.
0.78%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%1.22%1.10%0.97%0.88%0.68%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EXPE vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Expedia Group, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.43B
1.63B
(EXPE) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EXPE vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Expedia Group, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
89.0%
86.8%
Portfolio components
EXPE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expedia Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.05B and revenue of 3.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.0%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

EXPE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expedia Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 251.00M and revenue of 3.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

EXPE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expedia Group, Inc. reported a net income of 62.00M and revenue of 3.43B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EXPE and PLTR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to EXPE (11.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXPE dropped -82.73% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

EXPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXPE and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer