PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EXENS.PA (Exosens) and SMIN.L (Smiths Group PLC) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — EXENS.PA in Electrical Equipment & Parts, SMIN.L in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past year, EXENS.PA returned 40.18% vs 12.44% for SMIN.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Exosens (EXENS.PA) and Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXENS.PA is traded in EUR, while SMIN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SMIN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXENS.PA achieves a 29.90% return, which is significantly higher than SMIN.L's 8.41% return.

EXENS.PA

1D
1.38%
1M
4.81%
YTD
29.90%
6M
39.86%
1Y
40.18%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

SMIN.L

1D
0.10%
1M
1.41%
YTD
8.41%
6M
8.21%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
EXENS.PA
Exosens		29.90%149.94%-13.64%
SMIN.L
Smiths Group PLC		8.41%32.42%3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EXENS.PA and SMIN.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Exosens

Smiths Group PLC

Often compared with EXENS.PA:
EXENS.PA vs. MTX.DEEXENS.PA vs. IDR.MCEXENS.PA vs. KOG.OLEXENS.PA vs. CHG.LEXENS.PA vs. EXA.PAEXENS.PA vs. BA.LEXENS.PA vs. HO.PA
Often compared with SMIN.L:
SMIN.L vs. CHG.LSMIN.L vs. CHRT.LSMIN.L vs. HAG.DESMIN.L vs. KOG.OLSMIN.L vs. SAF.PASMIN.L vs. HO.PASMIN.L vs. IDR.MC

Return for Risk

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EXENS.PA
EXENS.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EXENS.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXENS.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXENS.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EXENS.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXENS.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
SMIN.L
SMIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SMIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exosens (EXENS.PA) and Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EXENS.PASMIN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.85
0.54

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.44
0.85

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

0.56

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

2.28

+1.73

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXENS.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the SMIN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXENS.PA and SMIN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EXENS.PASMIN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.54

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.54

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.38

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

0.25

+1.17

Drawdowns

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXENS.PA drawdown since its inception was -25.04%, smaller than the maximum SMIN.L drawdown of -58.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXENS.PA and SMIN.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EXENS.PASMIN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.04%

-58.89%

+33.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.36%

-22.00%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-22.16%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-22.16%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-58.89%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.66%

-6.71%

-6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-13.83%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.71%

5.44%

+4.27%

Volatility

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L - Volatility Comparison

Exosens (EXENS.PA) has a higher volatility of 14.77% compared to Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L) at 5.24%. This indicates that EXENS.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EXENS.PASMIN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.77%

5.24%

+9.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.92%

20.78%

+14.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.17%

22.88%

+24.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.08%

23.03%

+24.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.08%

27.30%

+19.78%

Dividends

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L - Dividend Comparison

EXENS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SMIN.L's 1.86% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXENS.PA
Exosens		0.48%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMIN.L
Smiths Group PLC		1.86%1.96%2.55%2.36%2.48%2.39%2.33%2.72%3.27%2.90%2.97%4.36%

Financials

EXENS.PA vs. SMIN.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exosens and Smiths Group PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. EXENS.PA values in EUR, SMIN.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions

EXENS.PA and SMIN.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXENS.PA and SMIN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer