PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWZ vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWZ vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZ achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than EFA's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZ has underperformed EFA with an annualized return of 7.53%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.28% annualized return.


EWZ

1D
-0.94%
1M
-13.88%
YTD
6.04%
6M
6.47%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
7.53%

EFA

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
7.13%
6M
9.67%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
9.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWZ vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
6.04%48.81%-30.41%32.62%12.09%-17.32%-20.35%27.67%-2.52%23.62%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
7.13%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZ and EFA is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2001

0.59

The correlation between EWZ and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWZ vs. EFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWZ
EFA

Financial Services

32.7%
24.6%

Energy

18.5%
4.0%

Basic Materials

13.7%
5.9%

Utilities

12.9%
4.0%

Industrials

10.9%
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
6.7%

Healthcare

2.4%
10.6%

Communication Services

2.2%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
7.6%

Technology

1.0%
10.4%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Financial Services

EWZ
32.7%
EFA
24.6%

Energy

EWZ
18.5%
EFA
4.0%

Basic Materials

EWZ
13.7%
EFA
5.9%

Utilities

EWZ
12.9%
EFA
4.0%

Industrials

EWZ
10.9%
EFA
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

EWZ
4.2%
EFA
6.7%

Healthcare

EWZ
2.4%
EFA
10.6%

Communication Services

EWZ
2.2%
EFA
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EWZ
1.5%
EFA
7.6%

Technology

EWZ
1.0%
EFA
10.4%

Real Estate

EWZ

-

EFA
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWZ vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWZ
EWZ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWZ vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWZEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.65

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

6.15

-1.19

EWZ vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZ and EFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWZEFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.23

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.49

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.54

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.31

-0.14

Drawdowns

EWZ vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZ drawdown since its inception was -77.25%, which is greater than EFA's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZ and EFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWZEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.25%

-61.04%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.27%

-11.42%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.36%

-14.05%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.24%

-29.53%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

-34.19%

-22.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.15%

-2.63%

-23.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.95%

-11.93%

-24.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

3.05%

+2.63%

Volatility

EWZ vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) at 4.54%. This indicates that EWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWZEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

4.54%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.79%

12.82%

+7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.12%

15.31%

+9.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.68%

16.52%

+11.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.07%

17.28%

+16.79%

EWZ vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWZ vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

EWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than EFA's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.16%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
4.89%5.19%8.91%5.66%12.59%9.87%1.71%2.54%2.89%1.71%1.81%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWZ and EFA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZ has higher volatility (7.32%) compared to EFA (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZ dropped -77.25% vs EFA's -61.04%.

On 10-year performance, EFA leads with 9.28% vs 7.53% for EWZ. On fees, EFA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFA has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZ.

EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 3.16% for EFA.

EWZ is categorized as Latin America Equities, while EFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWZ and 0.32% for EFA.

EFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWZ and EFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer