EWY vs. HYG
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 15.79%/yr vs 4.88%/yr for HYG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
EWY vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 90.95% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 15.79%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.88% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- 5.96%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 90.95%
- 6M
- 99.65%
- 1Y
- 189.48%
- 3Y*
- 44.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
HYG
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 4.88%
EWY vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 90.95% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.14% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and HYG is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EWY and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWY vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
HYG
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
EWY
HYG
-
Industrials
EWY
HYG
-
Financial Services
EWY
HYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
HYG
-
Healthcare
EWY
HYG
-
Communication Services
EWY
HYG
-
Basic Materials
EWY
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
EWY
HYG
-
Energy
EWY
HYG
-
Utilities
EWY
HYG
Real Estate
EWY
-
HYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
HYG
EWY vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWY | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.32 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.26 | 2.73 | +5.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.84 | 12.02 | +17.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWY | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23 | 1.67 | +2.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.59 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.46 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
EWY vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -34.25% | -39.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -2.34% | -20.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -4.56% | -22.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -15.79% | -32.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -22.03% | -27.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.33% | -0.45% | -13.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -3.24% | -16.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.38% | 0.53% | +5.85% |
Volatility
EWY vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.98% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.23%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.98% | 1.23% | +24.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.23% | 3.05% | +38.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.13% | 3.84% | +41.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 7.53% | +22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 8.29% | +19.54% |
EWY vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than HYG's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.10% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.93% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and HYG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.98%) compared to HYG (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 15.79% vs 4.88% for HYG. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 15.79% return vs 4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 1.10% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.49% for HYG.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer