EWJ vs. HYG
EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index, while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWJ returned 9.21%/yr vs 4.88%/yr for HYG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
EWJ vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWJ achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 9.21%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.88% annualized return.
EWJ
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 14.67%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
HYG
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 4.88%
EWJ vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 13.88% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.14% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJ and HYG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EWJ and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWJ vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJ
HYG
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
-
Industrials
EWJ
HYG
-
Technology
EWJ
HYG
-
Financial Services
EWJ
HYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWJ
HYG
-
Communication Services
EWJ
HYG
-
Healthcare
EWJ
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
EWJ
HYG
-
Basic Materials
EWJ
HYG
-
Real Estate
EWJ
HYG
Utilities
EWJ
HYG
Energy
EWJ
HYG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJ vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
EWJ
HYG
EWJ vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWJ | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.73 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 12.02 | -4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWJ | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 1.67 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.49 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.59 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.46 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
EWJ vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJ | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.93% | -34.25% | -26.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -2.34% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -4.56% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.14% | -15.79% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.14% | -22.03% | -11.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -0.45% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.73% | -3.24% | -18.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 0.53% | +3.49% |
Volatility
EWJ vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.23%. This indicates that EWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJ | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 1.23% | +3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.51% | 3.05% | +12.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.89% | 3.84% | +16.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 7.53% | +10.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 8.29% | +9.02% |
EWJ vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWJ and HYG have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
EWJ vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than HYG's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.97% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.93% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWJ and HYG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWJ has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to HYG (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 10-year performance, EWJ leads with 9.21% vs 4.88% for HYG. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWJ has performed better with a 9.21% return vs 4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWJ and HYG have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 3.97% for EWJ.
EWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index.
HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJ and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer