PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVR vs. RJF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EVR vs. RJF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evercore Inc. (EVR) and Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVR achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than RJF's -5.81% return. Over the past 10 years, EVR has outperformed RJF with an annualized return of 23.72%, while RJF has yielded a comparatively lower 17.32% annualized return.


EVR

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
0.49%
6M
3.66%
1Y
40.00%
3Y*
43.37%
5Y*
21.57%
10Y*
23.72%

RJF

1D
-0.83%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
-5.81%
6M
-7.87%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
17.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVR vs. RJF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVR
Evercore Inc.
0.49%24.25%64.35%60.59%-17.60%26.29%51.68%7.39%-18.93%33.42%
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
-5.81%4.74%40.83%6.12%8.32%59.48%8.70%22.80%-15.65%29.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EVR and RJF is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2006

0.58

The correlation between EVR and RJF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EVR:

$14.24B

RJF:

$30.08B

EPS

EVR:

$17.52

RJF:

$10.55

PE Ratio

EVR:

19.42

RJF:

14.23

PEG Ratio

EVR:

3.38

RJF:

1.21

PS Ratio

EVR:

3.17

RJF:

1.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

EVR:

$4.58B

RJF:

$16.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EVR:

$4.53B

RJF:

$6.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

EVR:

$1.04B

RJF:

$1.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVR vs. RJF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVR
EVR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

RJF
RJF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
RJF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RJF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RJF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RJF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RJF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVR vs. RJF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evercore Inc. (EVR) and Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVRRJFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.05

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.19

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

0.40

+3.00

EVR vs. RJF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the RJF Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVR and RJF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVRRJFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.15

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.48

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.56

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.50

-0.10

Drawdowns

EVR vs. RJF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVR drawdown since its inception was -81.49%, which is greater than RJF's maximum drawdown of -69.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVR and RJF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVRRJFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.49%

-69.68%

-11.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.08%

-19.64%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.86%

-28.12%

-19.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.61%

-32.11%

-17.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.42%

-45.59%

-21.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.76%

-14.02%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-14.63%

-6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.79%

9.19%

+2.60%

Volatility

EVR vs. RJF - Volatility Comparison

Evercore Inc. (EVR) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) at 7.61%. This indicates that EVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RJF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVRRJFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.90%

7.61%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.86%

19.38%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.23%

24.56%

+10.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.68%

28.05%

+7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.85%

30.96%

+5.89%

Dividends

EVR vs. RJF - Dividend Comparison

EVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than RJF's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVR
Evercore Inc.
1.00%0.98%1.14%1.75%2.60%1.95%2.14%3.00%2.66%1.58%1.85%2.13%
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
1.38%1.25%0.87%1.53%1.67%1.04%1.16%1.93%1.48%0.74%1.18%1.28%

Financials

EVR vs. RJF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Evercore Inc. and Raymond James Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.40B
4.26B
(EVR) Total Revenue
(RJF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EVR vs. RJF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Evercore Inc. and Raymond James Financial, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.0%
-87.6%
Portfolio components
EVR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Evercore Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.0%.

RJF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of -3.74B and revenue of 4.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -87.6%.

EVR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Evercore Inc. reported an operating income of 341.42M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

RJF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of -728.00M and revenue of 4.26B, resulting in an operating margin of -17.1%.

EVR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Evercore Inc. reported a net income of 301.24M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.

RJF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported a net income of 544.00M and revenue of 4.26B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EVR and RJF have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVR has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to RJF (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVR dropped -81.49% vs RJF's -69.68%.

EVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVR and RJF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer