PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVIBX vs. IWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVIBX vs. IWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVIBX achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than IWR's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, EVIBX has underperformed IWR with an annualized return of 4.91%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.


EVIBX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.53%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
4.91%

IWR

1D
0.08%
1M
1.05%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.50%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVIBX vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVIBX
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
0.64%8.21%6.57%10.67%-8.16%5.57%4.83%13.30%-2.77%6.03%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
10.71%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%-9.10%18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EVIBX and IWR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2001

0.38

The correlation between EVIBX and IWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVIBX vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVIBX
EVIBX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EVIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EVIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVIBX vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVIBXIWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.25

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.37

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

9.09

+3.57

EVIBX vs. IWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the IWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVIBX and IWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVIBXIWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.43

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.42

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.59

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.49

+0.52

Drawdowns

EVIBX vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVIBX drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVIBX and IWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVIBXIWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-58.78%

+21.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-8.17%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-21.09%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.67%

-26.18%

+13.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.06%

-40.59%

+19.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-2.04%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-7.80%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

2.12%

-1.66%

Volatility

EVIBX vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) is 0.88%, while iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that EVIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVIBXIWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

3.59%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

10.06%

-7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

13.54%

-10.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

18.25%

-13.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

19.38%

-13.98%

EVIBX vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVIBX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVIBX vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison

EVIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than IWR's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVIBX
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
6.10%5.91%5.36%4.59%5.65%5.04%5.69%5.62%6.01%5.53%5.85%6.54%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.17%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVIBX and IWR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWR has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to EVIBX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVIBX dropped -36.79% vs IWR's -58.78%.

EVIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVIBX and IWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer