EVER vs. QTWO
EVER (EverQuote, Inc.) and QTWO (Q2 Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. EVER operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while QTWO operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, EVER returned -10.62%/yr vs -13.94%/yr for QTWO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EVER vs. QTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVER achieves a -28.52% return, which is significantly higher than QTWO's -37.89% return.
EVER
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- -28.52%
- 6M
- -27.77%
- 1Y
- -23.93%
- 3Y*
- 34.46%
- 5Y*
- -10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
QTWO
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -10.59%
- YTD
- -37.89%
- 6M
- -39.02%
- 1Y
- -50.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- -13.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
EVER vs. QTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVER EverQuote, Inc. | -28.52% | 35.07% | 63.32% | -16.96% | -5.87% | -58.07% | 8.73% | 721.77% | -76.80% |
QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc. | -37.89% | -28.31% | 131.86% | 61.56% | -66.18% | -37.22% | 56.06% | 63.63% | -13.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVER and QTWO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
EVER:
$712.98M
QTWO:
$3.03B
EVER:
$2.92
QTWO:
$1.07
EVER:
6.60
QTWO:
41.78
EVER:
1.01
QTWO:
3.76
EVER:
$716.74M
QTWO:
$821.58M
EVER:
$698.48M
QTWO:
$456.61M
EVER:
$78.59M
QTWO:
$105.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVER vs. QTWO — Risk / Return Rank
EVER
QTWO
EVER vs. QTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) and Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVER | QTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.78 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | -0.96 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | -1.51 | +0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVER | QTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | -1.16 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | -0.28 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.21 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
EVER vs. QTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVER drawdown since its inception was -91.18%, which is greater than QTWO's maximum drawdown of -85.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVER and QTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVER | QTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.18% | -85.77% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.80% | -53.08% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.97% | -59.68% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.02% | -80.69% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -85.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.26% | -69.45% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.62% | -30.20% | -27.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.26% | 33.84% | -8.58% |
Volatility
EVER vs. QTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) is 15.86%, while Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) has a volatility of 18.44%. This indicates that EVER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVER | QTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.86% | 18.44% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.04% | 32.97% | +31.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.09% | 44.22% | +35.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.73% | 50.12% | +22.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.89% | 44.29% | +31.60% |
Dividends
EVER vs. QTWO - Dividend Comparison
Neither EVER nor QTWO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EVER vs. QTWO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EverQuote, Inc. and Q2 Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EVER vs. QTWO - Profitability Comparison
EVER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a gross profit of 186.59M and revenue of 190.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.8%.
QTWO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.91M and revenue of 216.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.1%.
EVER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.42M and revenue of 190.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.
QTWO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.69M and revenue of 216.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.
EVER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a net income of 18.67M and revenue of 190.85M, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.
QTWO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 26.64M and revenue of 216.51M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EVER and QTWO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTWO has higher volatility (18.44%) compared to EVER (15.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVER dropped -91.18% vs QTWO's -85.77%.
EVER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVER and QTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer