ETN vs. PAVE
ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) is a stock, while PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Over the past 5 years, ETN returned 24.42%/yr vs 17.22%/yr for PAVE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ETN vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETN achieves a 27.32% return, which is significantly higher than PAVE's 18.25% return.
ETN
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 27.32%
- 6M
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 30.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.42%
- 10Y*
- 23.50%
PAVE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 18.25%
- 6M
- 17.47%
- 1Y
- 33.79%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- —
ETN vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 27.32% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 12.59% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 18.25% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 14.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETN and PAVE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ETN and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETN vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
ETN
PAVE
ETN vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETN | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.30 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.85 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 10.42 | -7.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETN | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.80 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.80 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.67 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
ETN vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETN drawdown since its inception was -68.95%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETN and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETN | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.95% | -44.08% | -24.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.14% | -11.91% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.46% | -26.23% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.46% | -26.23% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -3.15% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -6.23% | -8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 3.25% | +5.53% |
Volatility
ETN vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a higher volatility of 12.39% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 5.44%. This indicates that ETN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETN | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.39% | 5.44% | +6.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.71% | 15.24% | +10.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.58% | 18.90% | +13.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.03% | 21.61% | +8.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 24.38% | +5.63% |
Dividends
ETN vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than PAVE's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.78% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETN and PAVE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETN has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to PAVE (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETN dropped -68.95% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETN and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer