ET vs. TLRY
ET (Energy Transfer LP) and TLRY (Tilray, Inc.) are both stocks. ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while TLRY operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, ET returned 21.43%/yr vs -52.78%/yr for TLRY. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ET vs. TLRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than TLRY's -44.30% return.
ET
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 19.30%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
TLRY
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -9.53%
- YTD
- -44.30%
- 6M
- -30.14%
- 1Y
- 24.01%
- 3Y*
- -31.86%
- 5Y*
- -52.78%
- 10Y*
- —
ET vs. TLRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 21.54% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -20.23% |
TLRY Tilray, Inc. | -44.30% | -32.11% | -42.17% | -14.50% | -61.74% | -14.89% | -51.78% | -75.72% | 206.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ET and TLRY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.23 |
The correlation between ET and TLRY shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ET:
$1.36
TLRY:
-$25.09
ET:
0.77
TLRY:
0.33
ET:
$89.38B
TLRY:
$1.11B
ET:
$20.48B
TLRY:
$307.02M
ET:
$13.02B
TLRY:
-$1.84B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ET vs. TLRY — Risk / Return Rank
ET
TLRY
ET vs. TLRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Tilray, Inc. (TLRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ET | TLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 0.32 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 0.48 | +3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ET | TLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.18 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | -0.56 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | -0.34 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
ET vs. TLRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, smaller than the maximum TLRY drawdown of -99.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and TLRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ET | TLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.81% | -99.83% | +12.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -76.48% | +66.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -89.12% | +64.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.82% | -98.20% | +72.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -99.77% | +94.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -91.42% | +65.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 49.70% | -45.13% |
Volatility
ET vs. TLRY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 5.27%, while Tilray, Inc. (TLRY) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ET | TLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 11.60% | -6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 63.70% | -51.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 131.48% | -115.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 94.96% | -70.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.02% | 111.98% | -76.96% |
Dividends
ET vs. TLRY - Dividend Comparison
ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, while TLRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.90% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
TLRY Tilray, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ET vs. TLRY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Tilray, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ET vs. TLRY - Profitability Comparison
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
TLRY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tilray, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.95M and revenue of 206.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
TLRY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tilray, Inc. reported an operating income of -26.39M and revenue of 206.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.8%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
TLRY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tilray, Inc. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 206.73M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ET and TLRY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLRY has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to ET (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ET dropped -87.81% vs TLRY's -99.83%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ET and TLRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer