ET vs. SNAP
ET (Energy Transfer LP) and SNAP (Snap Inc.) are both stocks. ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while SNAP operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, ET returned 21.43%/yr vs -38.02%/yr for SNAP. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ET vs. SNAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than SNAP's -29.99% return.
ET
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 19.30%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
SNAP
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- -29.99%
- 6M
- -29.64%
- 1Y
- -31.68%
- 3Y*
- -17.58%
- 5Y*
- -38.02%
- 10Y*
- —
ET vs. SNAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 21.54% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.84% |
SNAP Snap Inc. | -29.99% | -25.07% | -36.39% | 89.16% | -80.97% | -6.07% | 206.61% | 196.37% | -62.29% | -39.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ET and SNAP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between ET and SNAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ET:
$66.87B
SNAP:
$9.54B
ET:
$1.36
SNAP:
-$0.24
ET:
0.77
SNAP:
1.57
ET:
1.34
SNAP:
4.57
ET:
$89.38B
SNAP:
$6.10B
ET:
$20.48B
SNAP:
$3.40B
ET:
$13.02B
SNAP:
-$173.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ET vs. SNAP — Risk / Return Rank
ET
SNAP
ET vs. SNAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Snap Inc. (SNAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ET | SNAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.93 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | -0.51 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | -0.93 | +4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ET | SNAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | -0.57 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | -0.50 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | -0.20 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
ET vs. SNAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, smaller than the maximum SNAP drawdown of -95.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and SNAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ET | SNAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.81% | -95.27% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -62.03% | +52.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -77.48% | +52.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.82% | -95.27% | +69.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -93.20% | +88.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -60.01% | +34.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 33.93% | -29.36% |
Volatility
ET vs. SNAP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 5.27%, while Snap Inc. (SNAP) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ET | SNAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 13.84% | -8.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 41.11% | -29.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 55.46% | -39.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 75.99% | -51.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.02% | 71.79% | -36.77% |
Dividends
ET vs. SNAP - Dividend Comparison
ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, while SNAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.90% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
SNAP Snap Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ET vs. SNAP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Snap Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ET vs. SNAP - Profitability Comparison
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
SNAP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.55M and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
SNAP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported an operating income of -74.45M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.9%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
SNAP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported a net income of -88.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ET and SNAP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNAP has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to ET (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ET dropped -87.81% vs SNAP's -95.27%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ET and SNAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer