PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESLT vs. SOUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESLT vs. SOUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESLT achieves a 43.85% return, which is significantly higher than SOUN's -24.87% return.


ESLT

1D
0.83%
1M
6.13%
YTD
43.85%
6M
71.50%
1Y
98.59%
3Y*
60.25%
5Y*
45.92%
10Y*
25.96%

SOUN

1D
1.35%
1M
-15.65%
YTD
-24.87%
6M
-40.93%
1Y
-25.91%
3Y*
35.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESLT vs. SOUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
43.85%125.14%22.17%31.30%-24.31%
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
-24.87%-49.75%835.85%19.77%-76.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ESLT and SOUN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2022

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESLT:

$39.95B

SOUN:

$2.54B

EPS

ESLT:

$12.36

SOUN:

-$0.43

PS Ratio

ESLT:

4.80

SOUN:

15.98

PB Ratio

ESLT:

9.38

SOUN:

5.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESLT:

$8.23B

SOUN:

$183.99M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESLT:

$2.03B

SOUN:

$69.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESLT:

$861.06M

SOUN:

-$124.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESLT vs. SOUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SOUN
SOUN Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SOUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOUN Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SOUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESLT vs. SOUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESLTSOUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.00

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

-0.36

+4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

-0.58

+11.40

ESLT vs. SOUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the SOUN Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESLT and SOUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESLTSOUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

-0.32

+2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

-0.00

+0.62

Drawdowns

ESLT vs. SOUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESLT drawdown since its inception was -53.79%, smaller than the maximum SOUN drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLT and SOUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESLTSOUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.79%

-93.55%

+39.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.98%

-72.43%

+46.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.98%

-75.65%

+49.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.07%

-69.09%

+51.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-66.95%

+53.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.14%

44.50%

-35.36%

Volatility

ESLT vs. SOUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) is 15.36%, while SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) has a volatility of 19.06%. This indicates that ESLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESLTSOUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.36%

19.06%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.61%

51.57%

-17.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.26%

80.46%

-38.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.13%

136.34%

-103.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.13%

136.34%

-107.21%

Dividends

ESLT vs. SOUN - Dividend Comparison

ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while SOUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.37%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ESLT vs. SOUN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Elbit Systems Ltd and SoundHound AI, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
2.19B
44.20M
(ESLT) Total Revenue
(SOUN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ESLT and SOUN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOUN has higher volatility (19.06%) compared to ESLT (15.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESLT dropped -53.79% vs SOUN's -93.55%.

ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESLT and SOUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer