ESLT vs. GDXU
ESLT (Elbit Systems Ltd) is a stock, while GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. Over the past 5 years, ESLT returned 45.92%/yr vs -14.72%/yr for GDXU. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESLT vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESLT achieves a 43.85% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -57.47% return.
ESLT
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 43.85%
- 6M
- 71.50%
- 1Y
- 98.59%
- 3Y*
- 60.25%
- 5Y*
- 45.92%
- 10Y*
- 25.96%
GDXU
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -49.20%
- YTD
- -57.47%
- 6M
- -46.20%
- 1Y
- 38.54%
- 3Y*
- 35.00%
- 5Y*
- -14.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ESLT vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 43.85% | 125.14% | 22.17% | 31.30% | -4.82% | 34.77% | 8.77% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -57.47% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -54.93% | 4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESLT and GDXU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESLT vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank
ESLT
GDXU
ESLT vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESLT | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.18 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 0.48 | +3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.82 | 1.04 | +9.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESLT | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 0.28 | +2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.39 | -0.13 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | -0.13 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
ESLT vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESLT drawdown since its inception was -53.79%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLT and GDXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESLT | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.79% | -94.39% | +40.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.98% | -80.26% | +54.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.98% | -80.26% | +54.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.89% | -92.93% | +60.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.07% | -80.26% | +62.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -69.78% | +55.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.14% | 37.20% | -28.06% |
Volatility
ESLT vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) is 15.36%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 50.50%. This indicates that ESLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESLT | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.36% | 50.50% | -35.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.61% | 122.03% | -88.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.26% | 140.25% | -97.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 111.49% | -78.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.13% | 110.52% | -81.39% |
Dividends
ESLT vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.77% | 0.94% | 1.22% | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.14% | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.57% | 1.63% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESLT and GDXU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (50.50%) compared to ESLT (15.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESLT dropped -53.79% vs GDXU's -94.39%.
ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESLT and GDXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer