PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESLT vs. CYBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESLT vs. CYBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ESLT

1D
0.83%
1M
6.13%
YTD
43.85%
6M
71.50%
1Y
98.59%
3Y*
60.25%
5Y*
45.92%
10Y*
25.96%

CYBR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESLT vs. CYBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
43.85%125.14%22.17%31.30%-4.82%34.77%-14.56%37.62%-13.22%32.65%
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
-8.34%33.89%52.09%68.95%-25.18%7.23%38.61%57.24%79.13%-9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ESLT and CYBR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2014

0.18

The correlation between ESLT and CYBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESLT:

$39.95B

CYBR:

$20.69B

EPS

ESLT:

$12.36

CYBR:

-$2.92

PS Ratio

ESLT:

4.80

CYBR:

15.13

PB Ratio

ESLT:

9.38

CYBR:

8.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESLT:

$8.23B

CYBR:

$1.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESLT:

$2.03B

CYBR:

$1.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

ESLT:

$861.06M

CYBR:

$59.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESLT vs. CYBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CYBR
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESLT vs. CYBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESLTCYBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

ESLT vs. CYBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESLTCYBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

Drawdowns

ESLT vs. CYBR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESLTCYBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.14%

Volatility

ESLT vs. CYBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESLTCYBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.13%

Dividends

ESLT vs. CYBR - Dividend Comparison

ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while CYBR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.37%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%

Financials

ESLT vs. CYBR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Elbit Systems Ltd and CyberArk Software Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
2.19B
372.65M
(ESLT) Total Revenue
(CYBR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ESLT vs. CYBR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Elbit Systems Ltd and CyberArk Software Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
25.2%
71.7%
Portfolio components
ESLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

CYBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

ESLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

CYBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

ESLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

CYBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESLT and CYBR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESLT and CYBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer