PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIN.L vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIN.L vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESIN.L is traded in GBP, while VXUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VXUS values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIN.L achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 12.20% return.


ESIN.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
6.96%
6M
8.39%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
19.50%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*

VXUS

1D
0.82%
1M
0.14%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.30%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIN.L vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESIN.L
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc
6.96%30.98%9.83%24.32%-11.34%-5.75%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
12.20%22.92%6.91%10.07%-6.10%4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIN.L and VXUS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2021

0.56

The correlation between ESIN.L and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESIN.L vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESIN.L
VXUS

Industrials

96.2%
16.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
4.4%

Financial Services

1.3%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
5.0%

Technology

0.4%
18.1%

Basic Materials

0.3%
7.6%

Energy

-

5.2%

Healthcare

-

7.1%

Real Estate

-

2.6%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Industrials

ESIN.L
96.2%
VXUS
16.1%

Communication Services

ESIN.L
2.2%
VXUS
4.4%

Financial Services

ESIN.L
1.3%
VXUS
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ESIN.L
1.1%
VXUS
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

ESIN.L
0.4%
VXUS
5.0%

Technology

ESIN.L
0.4%
VXUS
18.1%

Basic Materials

ESIN.L
0.3%
VXUS
7.6%

Energy

ESIN.L

-

VXUS
5.2%

Healthcare

ESIN.L

-

VXUS
7.1%

Real Estate

ESIN.L

-

VXUS
2.6%

Utilities

ESIN.L

-

VXUS
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIN.L vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIN.L
ESIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIN.L vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESIN.LVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.43

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.89

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.38

11.70

-7.32

ESIN.L vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIN.L and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESIN.LVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.21

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.71

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.49

-0.03

Drawdowns

ESIN.L vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIN.L drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, roughly equal to the maximum VXUS drawdown of -28.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIN.L and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIN.LVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-28.73%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-9.99%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

-13.06%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.82%

-14.57%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-2.81%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-5.11%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

2.47%

+1.54%

Volatility

ESIN.L vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIN.LVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.01%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.73%

11.33%

+4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

13.12%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

13.01%

+7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

15.48%

+5.46%

ESIN.L vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIN.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESIN.L vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

ESIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESIN.L
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.73%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESIN.L and VXUS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIN.L.

ESIN.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. ESIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIN.L and 0.05% for VXUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIN.L and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer