ES vs. SOUN
ES (Eversource Energy) and SOUN (SoundHound AI, Inc.) are both stocks. ES operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while SOUN operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, ES returned 3.55%/yr vs 35.66%/yr for SOUN. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ES vs. SOUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ES achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than SOUN's -24.87% return.
ES
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 8.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
SOUN
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- YTD
- -24.87%
- 6M
- -40.93%
- 1Y
- -25.91%
- 3Y*
- 35.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ES vs. SOUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ES Eversource Energy | 3.41% | 22.86% | -2.46% | -23.43% | -5.00% |
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | -24.87% | -49.75% | 835.85% | 19.77% | -76.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ES and SOUN is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2022 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
ES:
$25.64B
SOUN:
$2.54B
ES:
$4.68
SOUN:
-$0.43
ES:
1.83
SOUN:
15.98
ES:
0.00
SOUN:
5.50
ES:
$13.93B
SOUN:
$183.99M
ES:
$4.19B
SOUN:
$69.84M
ES:
$4.60B
SOUN:
-$124.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ES vs. SOUN — Risk / Return Rank
ES
SOUN
ES vs. SOUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eversource Energy (ES) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ES | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.00 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | -0.36 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | -0.58 | +1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ES | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | -0.32 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | -0.00 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
ES vs. SOUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ES drawdown since its inception was -73.04%, smaller than the maximum SOUN drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES and SOUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ES | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.04% | -93.55% | +20.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.13% | -72.43% | +57.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.65% | -75.65% | +47.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.08% | -69.09% | +55.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.07% | -66.95% | +47.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.23% | 44.50% | -38.27% |
Volatility
ES vs. SOUN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eversource Energy (ES) is 7.84%, while SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) has a volatility of 19.06%. This indicates that ES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ES | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 19.06% | -11.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 51.57% | -35.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.64% | 80.46% | -55.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.94% | 136.34% | -112.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 136.34% | -111.99% |
Dividends
ES vs. SOUN - Dividend Comparison
ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, while SOUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ES Eversource Energy | 4.52% | 4.47% | 4.98% | 4.37% | 3.04% | 2.65% | 2.62% | 2.52% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 3.22% | 3.27% |
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ES vs. SOUN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eversource Energy and SoundHound AI, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ES and SOUN have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOUN has higher volatility (19.06%) compared to ES (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ES dropped -73.04% vs SOUN's -93.55%.
ES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ES and SOUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer