ES vs. SMR
ES (Eversource Energy) and SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) are both stocks. ES operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while SMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ES returned 0.13%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for SMR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ES vs. SMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ES achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -24.06% return.
ES
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 8.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
SMR
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -24.06%
- 6M
- -50.09%
- 1Y
- -68.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- —
ES vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ES Eversource Energy | 3.41% | 22.86% | -2.46% | -23.43% | -5.06% | 8.18% | 1.25% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -24.06% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ES and SMR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
ES:
$25.64B
SMR:
$3.44B
ES:
$4.68
SMR:
-$2.02
ES:
1.83
SMR:
113.60
ES:
0.00
SMR:
2.95
ES:
$13.93B
SMR:
$18.10M
ES:
$4.19B
SMR:
$4.45M
ES:
$4.60B
SMR:
-$696.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ES vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank
ES
SMR
ES vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eversource Energy (ES) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ES | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.91 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | -0.83 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | -1.22 | +2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ES | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | -0.66 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.02 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
ES vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ES drawdown since its inception was -73.04%, smaller than the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES and SMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ES | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.04% | -87.47% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.13% | -82.86% | +67.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.65% | -82.86% | +54.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.69% | -87.47% | +45.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.08% | -79.86% | +65.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.07% | -34.97% | +15.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.23% | 56.46% | -50.23% |
Volatility
ES vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eversource Energy (ES) is 7.84%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 29.21%. This indicates that ES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ES | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 29.21% | -21.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 69.12% | -53.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.64% | 104.37% | -79.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.94% | 93.41% | -69.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 89.34% | -64.99% |
Dividends
ES vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison
ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, while SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ES Eversource Energy | 4.52% | 4.47% | 4.98% | 4.37% | 3.04% | 2.65% | 2.62% | 2.52% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 3.22% | 3.27% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ES vs. SMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eversource Energy and NuScale Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ES and SMR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (29.21%) compared to ES (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ES dropped -73.04% vs SMR's -87.47%.
ES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ES and SMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer