PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNS.L achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than WMVG.L's 1.26% return.


ERNS.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.58%
6M
2.02%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
2.20%

WMVG.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.26%
6M
2.42%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
1.58%4.84%5.55%4.76%1.53%0.14%0.77%0.92%
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
1.26%9.07%14.47%7.36%-8.31%16.96%-1.30%11.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNS.L and WMVG.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNS.L
ERNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

WMVG.L
WMVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERNS.LWMVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.43

1.07

+1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.17

0.57

+19.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

113.36

1.39

+111.97

ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.44, which is higher than the WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNS.L and WMVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERNS.LWMVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.44

0.38

+5.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

4.40

0.61

+3.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

0.56

+1.68

Drawdowns

ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNS.L drawdown since its inception was -1.51%, smaller than the maximum WMVG.L drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNS.L and WMVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNS.LWMVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-28.25%

+26.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.22%

-4.93%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.22%

-9.07%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

-15.18%

+14.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-3.25%

+3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-4.11%

+4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

2.02%

-1.98%

Volatility

ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) is 0.34%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that ERNS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNS.LWMVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

2.22%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.68%

5.01%

-4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81%

7.31%

-6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.83%

9.99%

-9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.92%

12.15%

-11.23%

ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than WMVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERNS.L vs. WMVG.L - Dividend Comparison

ERNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while WMVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
5.65%4.65%5.42%4.54%1.14%0.28%0.75%1.04%0.74%0.52%0.81%0.72%
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNS.L and WMVG.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WMVG.L.

ERNS.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while WMVG.L is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNS.L and 0.35% for WMVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNS.L and WMVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer