PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERAS vs. ATEYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ERAS vs. ATEYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) and Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERAS achieves a 245.97% return, which is significantly higher than ATEYY's 31.02% return.


ERAS

1D
7.52%
1M
27.17%
YTD
245.97%
6M
285.33%
1Y
704.37%
3Y*
63.40%
5Y*
10Y*

ATEYY

1D
7.82%
1M
-16.54%
YTD
31.02%
6M
27.11%
1Y
199.81%
3Y*
73.30%
5Y*
49.34%
10Y*
51.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERAS vs. ATEYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ERAS
Erasca, Inc.
245.97%48.21%17.84%-50.58%-72.34%-10.61%
ATEYY
Advantest Corp DRC
31.02%122.70%68.99%111.43%-33.43%14.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ERAS and ATEYY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ERAS:

$3.92B

ATEYY:

$120.75B

EPS

ERAS:

-$0.96

ATEYY:

$520.21

PB Ratio

ERAS:

9.95

ATEYY:

0.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

ERAS:

$0.00

ATEYY:

$1.14T

Gross Profit (TTM)

ERAS:

-$743.00K

ATEYY:

$736.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

ERAS:

-$279.47M

ATEYY:

$533.69B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERAS vs. ATEYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERAS
ERAS Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ERAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERAS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ERAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERAS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ATEYY
ATEYY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ATEYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEYY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEYY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERAS vs. ATEYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) and Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERASATEYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.39

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.96

6.05

+5.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.13

16.62

+21.51

ERAS vs. ATEYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERAS Sharpe Ratio is 6.83, which is higher than the ATEYY Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERAS and ATEYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERASATEYYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.83

2.96

+3.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

1.13

-1.20

Drawdowns

ERAS vs. ATEYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERAS drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than ATEYY's maximum drawdown of -56.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERAS and ATEYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERASATEYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-56.48%

-39.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.46%

-33.24%

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.68%

-44.70%

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.12%

-16.54%

-30.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.82%

-14.23%

-60.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.61%

12.08%

+6.53%

Volatility

ERAS vs. ATEYY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) is 20.75%, while Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) has a volatility of 21.85%. This indicates that ERAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERASATEYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.75%

21.85%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

96.00%

51.89%

+44.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.32%

68.01%

+36.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.42%

52.61%

+30.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.42%

48.23%

+35.19%

Dividends

ERAS vs. ATEYY - Dividend Comparison

Neither ERAS nor ATEYY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ATEYY
Advantest Corp DRC
0.00%0.11%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.18%1.24%
ERAS
Erasca, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ERAS vs. ATEYY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Erasca, Inc. and Advantest Corp DRC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B350.00B202220232024202520260
334.10B
(ERAS) Total Revenue
(ATEYY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ERAS and ATEYY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATEYY has higher volatility (21.85%) compared to ERAS (20.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERAS dropped -95.65% vs ATEYY's -56.48%.

ERAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.83 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERAS and ATEYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer