PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX.TO) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQX.TO achieves a -21.50% return, which is significantly lower than LUN.TO's 29.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EQX.TO has underperformed LUN.TO with an annualized return of 7.28%, while LUN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 27.33% annualized return.


EQX.TO

1D
0.33%
1M
-22.58%
YTD
-21.50%
6M
-18.72%
1Y
59.40%
3Y*
33.39%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
7.28%

LUN.TO

1D
2.26%
1M
2.49%
YTD
29.22%
6M
50.43%
1Y
164.52%
3Y*
59.24%
5Y*
28.33%
10Y*
27.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
-21.50%166.44%12.42%45.37%-48.25%-35.00%31.83%95.88%-8.93%-38.46%
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
29.22%141.86%17.72%35.67%-11.74%-9.34%49.12%40.12%-31.40%32.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EQX.TO and LUN.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2014

0.21

The correlation between EQX.TO and LUN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EQX.TO:

CA$12.48B

LUN.TO:

CA$32.76B

EPS

EQX.TO:

CA$0.94

LUN.TO:

CA$1.69

PE Ratio

EQX.TO:

16.01

LUN.TO:

22.54

PEG Ratio

EQX.TO:

0.03

LUN.TO:

0.14

PS Ratio

EQX.TO:

3.49

LUN.TO:

8.10

PB Ratio

EQX.TO:

2.04

LUN.TO:

4.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQX.TO:

CA$2.84B

LUN.TO:

CA$4.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQX.TO:

CA$1.21B

LUN.TO:

CA$1.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

EQX.TO:

CA$1.38B

LUN.TO:

CA$1.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQX.TO
EQX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EQX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EQX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LUN.TO
LUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX.TO) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQX.TOLUN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.45

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

4.92

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

16.40

-12.45

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQX.TO and LUN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQX.TOLUN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

3.15

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.62

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.60

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.15

-0.11

Drawdowns

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQX.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.51%, smaller than the maximum LUN.TO drawdown of -95.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQX.TO and LUN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQX.TOLUN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.51%

-95.33%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.09%

-33.67%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.09%

-47.11%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.34%

-53.91%

-15.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.51%

-57.61%

-22.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.89%

-14.17%

-26.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.60%

-48.72%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.10%

10.08%

+5.02%

Volatility

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX.TO) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) have volatilities of 20.71% and 20.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQX.TOLUN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.71%

20.66%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.78%

44.38%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.98%

52.71%

+6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.90%

46.18%

+9.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.44%

45.95%

+10.49%

Dividends

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than LUN.TO's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
0.29%0.68%3.64%3.32%5.66%3.95%1.42%1.55%2.13%1.44%

Financials

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equinox Gold Corp. and Lundin Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
861.59M
1.16B
(EQX.TO) Total Revenue
(LUN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

EQX.TO vs. LUN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Equinox Gold Corp. and Lundin Mining Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
50.9%
46.4%
Portfolio components
EQX.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinox Gold Corp. reported a gross profit of 438.50M and revenue of 861.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

LUN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 537.50M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

EQX.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinox Gold Corp. reported an operating income of 390.23M and revenue of 861.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.3%.

LUN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 503.80M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.

EQX.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinox Gold Corp. reported a net income of 310.11M and revenue of 861.59M, resulting in a net margin of 36.0%.

LUN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 281.40M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EQX.TO and LUN.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQX.TO and LUN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer