PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQT vs. NKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EQT vs. NKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EQT Corporation (EQT) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly higher than NKE's -31.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EQT has outperformed NKE with an annualized return of 3.48%, while NKE has yielded a comparatively lower -1.05% annualized return.


EQT

1D
-1.43%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
-9.17%
1Y
-4.95%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
20.42%
10Y*
3.48%

NKE

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
-31.08%
6M
-30.90%
1Y
-29.27%
3Y*
-24.25%
5Y*
-18.65%
10Y*
-1.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQT vs. NKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQT
EQT Corporation
-0.60%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-12.80%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
-31.08%-13.83%-29.11%-6.01%-29.04%18.70%40.97%38.09%19.87%24.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EQT and NKE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987

0.17

The correlation between EQT and NKE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EQT:

$33.12B

NKE:

$64.00B

EPS

EQT:

$5.40

NKE:

$1.52

PE Ratio

EQT:

9.81

NKE:

28.43

PS Ratio

EQT:

3.28

NKE:

1.38

PB Ratio

EQT:

1.32

NKE:

4.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQT:

$10.03B

NKE:

$46.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQT:

$6.43B

NKE:

$18.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

EQT:

$7.48B

NKE:

$3.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQT vs. NKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

NKE
NKE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NKE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NKE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQT vs. NKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQTNKEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.87

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

-0.64

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

-1.23

+0.78

EQT vs. NKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQT Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is higher than the NKE Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQT and NKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQTNKEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

-0.77

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

-0.52

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

-0.03

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.41

-0.11

Drawdowns

EQT vs. NKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, which is greater than NKE's maximum drawdown of -75.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and NKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQTNKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.51%

-75.19%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.79%

-46.18%

+24.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-64.21%

+32.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.56%

-74.64%

+32.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.28%

-74.64%

-13.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.79%

-73.59%

+51.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

-20.91%

-2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.10%

23.82%

-12.72%

Volatility

EQT vs. NKE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 7.95%, while NIKE, Inc. (NKE) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQTNKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

9.43%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.26%

29.22%

-7.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

38.22%

-5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.80%

35.82%

+6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.92%

32.25%

+16.67%

Dividends

EQT vs. NKE - Dividend Comparison

EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than NKE's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.23%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
3.77%2.53%2.00%1.28%1.07%0.68%0.71%0.89%1.11%1.18%1.30%0.93%

Financials

EQT vs. NKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and NIKE, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
3.38B
11.28B
(EQT) Total Revenue
(NKE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EQT vs. NKE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EQT Corporation and NIKE, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.4%
40.2%
Portfolio components
EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

NKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53B and revenue of 11.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

NKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported an operating income of 553.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.

NKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a net income of 520.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EQT and NKE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NKE has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to EQT (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQT dropped -91.51% vs NKE's -75.19%.

EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQT and NKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer