EQQQ.L vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQQQ.L returned 22.24%/yr vs 37.17%/yr for SMH. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQQQ.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

EQQQ.L vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EQQQ.L is traded in GBp, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQQ.L achieves a 17.33% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 59.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EQQQ.L has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 22.24%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.17% annualized return.

EQQQ.L

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: 17.33%
• 6M: 15.28%
• 1Y: 38.00%
• 3Y*: 24.64%
• 5Y*: 18.12%
• 10Y*: 22.24%

SMH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 59.78%
• 6M: 54.85%
• 1Y: 129.28%
• 3Y*: 54.77%
• 5Y*: 38.10%
• 10Y*: 37.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQQ.L vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	17.33%	11.54%	28.55%	47.79%	-25.54%	29.59%	43.32%	33.69%	4.64%	20.12%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	67.71%	38.54%	41.53%	64.71%	-25.63%	43.48%	50.97%	58.19%	-3.66%	26.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQQ.L and SMH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007	0.49

The correlation between EQQQ.L and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQQQ.L vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQQQ.L	SMH
Technology	57.9%	100.0%
Communication Services	14.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	-
Healthcare	3.7%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

EQQQ.L vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQQ.L

EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQQ.L vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQQQ.L	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	4.22	-1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	4.32	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.62	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	10.39	-6.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.14	35.90	-25.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQQQ.L vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQQ.L and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQQQ.L	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	4.22	-1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	1.14	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.15	1.17	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.82	-0.71

Drawdowns

EQQQ.L vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -47.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.L and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQQQ.L	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.36%	-47.21%	-18.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.97%	-12.51%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.09%	-35.65%	+11.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.76%	-35.65%	+7.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.76%	-35.65%	+7.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	-10.16%	+7.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.51%	-8.74%	-3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	3.61%	+0.13%

Volatility

EQQQ.L vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) is 4.63%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.00%. This indicates that EQQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQQQ.L	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	14.00%	-9.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.51%	24.81%	-14.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.87%	30.89%	-16.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.16%	33.71%	-14.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.36%	32.02%	-12.66%

EQQQ.L vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQQ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQQQ.L vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	0.23%	0.29%	0.38%	0.39%	0.56%	0.25%	0.41%	0.56%	0.63%	0.67%	0.77%	0.72%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQQQ.L and SMH in my portfolio?

EQQQ.L and SMH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EQQQ.L or SMH?

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQQQ.L or SMH?

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

What is the main difference between EQQQ.L and SMH?

EQQQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SMH is Semiconductors. EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQQ.L and 0.35% for SMH.