PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQGB.L is traded in GBp, while VWRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQGB.L achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than VWRD.L's 10.40% return.


EQGB.L

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.58%
YTD
15.56%
6M
14.80%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
26.37%
5Y*
15.56%
10Y*

VWRD.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
2.30%
YTD
10.40%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.42%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQGB.L
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc
15.56%19.59%26.12%53.92%-35.07%27.68%45.43%41.84%-2.42%5.20%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
10.40%13.67%19.71%16.20%-8.46%19.64%12.72%20.89%-4.34%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EQGB.L and VWRD.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017

0.74

The correlation between EQGB.L and VWRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQGB.L
VWRD.L

Technology

53.6%
30.2%

Communication Services

15.8%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.1%

Industrials

3.1%
10.2%

Utilities

1.4%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.1%
3.6%

Energy

0.6%
4.3%

Financial Services

0.2%
16.1%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.6%

Technology

EQGB.L
53.6%
VWRD.L
30.2%

Communication Services

EQGB.L
15.8%
VWRD.L
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EQGB.L
12.2%
VWRD.L
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

EQGB.L
7.7%
VWRD.L
4.9%

Healthcare

EQGB.L
4.2%
VWRD.L
8.1%

Industrials

EQGB.L
3.1%
VWRD.L
10.2%

Utilities

EQGB.L
1.4%
VWRD.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

EQGB.L
1.1%
VWRD.L
3.6%

Energy

EQGB.L
0.6%
VWRD.L
4.3%

Financial Services

EQGB.L
0.2%
VWRD.L
16.1%

Real Estate

EQGB.L
0.1%
VWRD.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQGB.L
EQGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EQGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQGB.LVWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.92

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.97

15.06

-4.09

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQGB.L and VWRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQGB.LVWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.29

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.85

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.88

+0.05

Drawdowns

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than VWRD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQGB.L and VWRD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQGB.LVWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.77%

-25.85%

-10.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-6.96%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.76%

-18.12%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.77%

-18.12%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-1.92%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-3.40%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

1.82%

+1.36%

Volatility

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) at 3.71%. This indicates that EQGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQGB.LVWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

3.71%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.15%

9.31%

+2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

11.94%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

14.08%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

15.28%

+5.96%

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRD.L's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQGB.L vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

EQGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQGB.L
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.26%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQGB.L and VWRD.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQGB.L.

EQGB.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VWRD.L is Global Equities. EQGB.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQGB.L and 0.22% for VWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQGB.L and VWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer