PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQAC.MI vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQAC.MI vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQAC.MI is traded in EUR, while UUP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UUP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQAC.MI achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.61% return.


EQAC.MI

1D
-0.78%
1M
5.87%
YTD
20.38%
6M
18.62%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*

UUP

1D
-0.08%
1M
4.76%
YTD
5.61%
6M
4.01%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
2.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAC.MI vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EQAC.MI
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
20.38%6.78%35.08%50.29%-30.28%40.00%35.43%6.99%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.61%-16.26%20.99%0.52%16.24%13.64%-14.36%-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAC.MI and UUP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019

0.06

The correlation between EQAC.MI and UUP shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.16 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQAC.MI vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAC.MI
EQAC.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EQAC.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQAC.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQAC.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EQAC.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQAC.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAC.MI vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQAC.MIUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.07

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

0.56

+3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

1.34

+9.98

EQAC.MI vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAC.MI Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAC.MI and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQAC.MIUUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

0.36

+2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.49

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.16

+0.90

Drawdowns

EQAC.MI vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAC.MI drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAC.MI and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQAC.MIUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-34.79%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-7.84%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.69%

-22.00%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

-22.51%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-13.76%

+12.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-15.68%

+8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.29%

+0.05%

Volatility

EQAC.MI vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQAC.MI) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 2.56%. This indicates that EQAC.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQAC.MIUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

2.56%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

8.49%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

12.24%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

14.73%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

14.11%

+7.12%

EQAC.MI vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQAC.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQAC.MI vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

EQAC.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQAC.MI
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.31%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQAC.MI and UUP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQAC.MI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQAC.MI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

EQAC.MI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while UUP is Currency. EQAC.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQAC.MI and 0.75% for UUP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQAC.MI and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer