PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPOL vs. CSPX.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPOL vs. CSPX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EPOL is traded in USD, while CSPX.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSPX.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.AS's 8.32% return. Over the past 10 years, EPOL has underperformed CSPX.AS with an annualized return of 11.52%, while CSPX.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.


EPOL

1D
1.31%
1M
0.97%
YTD
11.99%
6M
21.57%
1Y
40.69%
3Y*
34.12%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
11.52%

CSPX.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
8.32%
6M
8.95%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
15.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPOL vs. CSPX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
11.99%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
8.32%17.97%25.59%26.14%-19.39%30.70%17.25%30.40%-5.01%22.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EPOL and CSPX.AS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2010

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPOL vs. CSPX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPX.AS
CSPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPOL vs. CSPX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPOLCSPX.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.89

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.10

12.19

-2.09

EPOL vs. CSPX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPOL and CSPX.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPOLCSPX.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.17

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.82

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.91

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.89

-0.68

Drawdowns

EPOL vs. CSPX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than CSPX.AS's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and CSPX.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPOLCSPX.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-34.12%

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-8.56%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.81%

-19.52%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.21%

-24.42%

-29.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

-34.12%

-27.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-2.30%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.88%

-3.71%

-23.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

2.03%

+2.01%

Volatility

EPOL vs. CSPX.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) at 3.07%. This indicates that EPOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPOLCSPX.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

3.07%

+4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.80%

8.07%

+9.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.40%

11.39%

+12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.11%

15.85%

+13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.66%

16.31%

+11.35%

EPOL vs. CSPX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.AS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPOL vs. CSPX.AS - Dividend Comparison

EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, while CSPX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
4.27%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPOL and CSPX.AS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSPX.AS is S&P 500. EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while CSPX.AS tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.07% for CSPX.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPOL and CSPX.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer